Skip to content

A Study Comparing Sotorasib With Durvalumab in People With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

A Randomized Phase II Study of Sotorasib Versus Continued Consolidation Durvalumab in Patients With KRAS G12C Mutant Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (LANSCLC) With Persistent ctDNA Defined Minimal Residual Disease

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06333678
Enrollment
10
Registered
2024-03-27
Start date
2024-03-20
Completion date
2026-01-27
Last updated
2026-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

Sotorasib, Durvalumab, Locally advanced disease, KRAS p.G12C mutation, 22-321

Brief summary

In this study, the researchers will look at whether having participants switch from durvalumab to sotorasib when they have detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) is an effective treatment approach for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). The researchers will see whether this switch to sotorasib can control LANSCLC longer compared to the treatment approach of staying on durvalumab (and not switching to sotorasib).

Detailed description

In the first phase of the randomized trial, defined as the Pre-Monitoring Phase, patients with LANSCLC with a KRAS G12C mutation who are planned to undergo, are undergoing, or very recently completed definitive chemoradiation with the plan for durvalumab consolidation are enrolled. Chemoradiation treatment and all clinical assessments during the Pre-Monitoring Phase are per standard of care as per institutional standards. Patients who (1) complete chemoradiation, (2) have detectable ctDNA post chemoradiation, (3) are without evidence of progressive disease on imaging, (4) and are planned to start durvalumab consolidation then continue into the Monitoring Phase. All other patients are no longer on trial and are taken off study. Patients in the Monitoring Phase will have ctDNA measured again early-on during durvalumab consolidation (i.e. cycle 3 of durvlalumab +/- 2 weeks) in conjunction with standard of care imaging. Patients with MRD will then continue to the Randomization Phase of trial. In the Randomization Phase patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to continue standard of care durvalumab (group 1) vs. switch to sotorasib at 960 mg daily (group 2), with the primary endpoint of PFS. Patients switching to sotorasib will undergo a 28-day durvalumab washout and will receive sotorasib at 960 mg daily until progression. Washout will be confirmed by ensuring that cycle 1, day 1 of sotorasib is scheduled for at least 28 days after the most recent durvalumab dose.

Interventions

DRUGDurvalumab

10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks or 1500 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks for up to 12 months.

DRUGSotorasib

960 mg, Patients who do not tolerate sotorasib at 960 mg can be dose reduced to 120 mg.

Sponsors

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
Amgen
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Phase II randomized trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Pre-Monitoring Phase * Histologic diagnosis of NSCLC * Locally advanced disease, defined as AJCC 8th Edition Stage III disease. * Plan for, currently receiving, or recently completed definitive chemoradiation. Definitive radiation is defined as 56-70 Gy in 28-35 fractions concurrently with one of the following chemotherapy regimens: * Carboplatin + pemetrexed * Cisplatin + pemetrexed * Paclitaxel + carboplatin * Cisplatin + etoposide * KRAS p.G12C mutation identified through molecular testing * Adequate hepatic function, with adequate function defined as AST and ALT \< 2.5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) * Patient eligible for consolidative durvalumab therapy * ECOG Performance status 0 - 2. * Age ≥ 18 years. * Patients must have decision-making capacity to consent to the study. * Female subjects must either be of non-reproductive potential (i.e. post-menopausal by history: \>/= 55 years old and no menses for 1\> year without an alternative medical cause; OR history of hysterectomy, OR history of bilateral salpingectomy OR history of bilateral oophorectomy) or must be willing to comply with contraception requirements. Monitoring Phase * Completed definitive chemoradiation. Definitive radiation is defined as 56-70 Gy in 28-35 fractions concurrently with one of the following chemotherapy regimens: * Carboplatin + pemetrexed * Cisplatin + pemetrexed * Paclitaxel + carboplatin * Cisplatin + etoposide * Detectable ctDNA measured within 8 weeks (+2 weeks) of completing definitive chemoradiation * No evidence of radiographic progression, as measured through SOC imaging, as deemed by principal investigator, including a CT scan of the chest * ECOG Performance status 0 - 2. * Plan to start or already started durvalumab consolidation Therapeutic Phase * No evidence of radiographic RECIST 1.1 progression, as measured through SOC imaging, as deemed by principal investigator, including a CT scan of the chest * MRD as measured by ctDNA testing (described above) * Candidate for sotorasib therapy * Must have a negative pregnancy test (serum or urine) within 3 days prior to the first dose of sotorasib (if assigned to Group 2).

Exclusion criteria

* Serious medical co-morbidities precluding radiotherapy, determined at the discretion of the treating investigator. * Pregnant or lactating women. * Physical limitation to undergo radiotherapy. * Other active malignancy (e.g. receiving active treatment) within the last year except for basal cell carcinoma of the skin and in situ malignancy even if without evidence of disease and patients on adjuvant hormonal therapies (e.g. breast, prostate), or bladder cancer with localized diseases * Prior pneumonitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free survival (PFS)up to 3 yearsPFS will be defined as the time from randomization until progression or death , or from the time of randomization until the last follow up imaging (if no progression and alive). Progression will be evaluated by RECIST 1.1 guidelines.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT)1 month after starting Sotorasibwhich we define as a hospitalization, life threatening condition, any death not clearly due to the underlying disease or extraneous causes, or therapy-related grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity. The study will continue if the definition of "acceptable safety" is met.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNarek Shaverdian, MD

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 3, 2026