Skip to content

Intradermal BoNT-A Treatment in Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea

Effects of Botulinum Toxin Type a Treatment on Clinical and Biophysical Parameters in Patients With Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-masked Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06331533
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-03-26
Start date
2022-11-01
Completion date
2023-06-01
Last updated
2024-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea

Brief summary

Investigation of the effectiveness of intradermal botulinum toxin A treatment in the treatment of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR) using clinical, biophysical, dermatoscopic and videocapillaroscopy.

Detailed description

There is no gold standard treatment for erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR). In recent years, some studies have been conducted to demonstrate the efficacy of intradermal botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) treatment in ETR and facial erythema. Studies including objective and quantitative measurements are limited. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of intradermal BoNT-A treatment in ETR patients. This randomised, double-blind, split-face study included 30 participants with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea (ETR). They were randomly randomised to intradermal BoNT-A on one side of the face and placebo on the other side. Clinician's erythema assessment (CEA) score, patient self-assessment (PSA) score, erythema index (EI), melanin index (MI), dermatoscopic and capillaroscopic analyses of background erythema and vascular structure were assessed at baseline and one month after treatment.

Interventions

DRUGBotulinum toxin A

Intradermal botulinum toxin A was applied to the treatment side

DRUGPlacebo

NaCl was injected into the placebo side

Sponsors

Istanbul Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Botulinum toxin will be injected into one randomly selected half of the face, and placebo will be injected into the other half of the face. The patient will not know which half of the face was treated. An independent, blinded dermatologist will evaluate the results of the treatment.

Intervention model description

Randomized, split face, efficacy study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18-60 years old * Erythematotelangiectatic rosacea subtype * Willingness to participate in the research and providing informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients under 18 years of age, over 60 years of age * A rosacea subtype other than ETR * History of using topical or systemic medications within the past two weeks due to rosacea or other dermatoses * Known history of autoimmune disease * History of neuromuscular disease * History of facial botulinum toxin injection within the last six months * Reporting allergy to the active ingredient * Pregnant or breastfeeding patients * Patients who do not accept treatment and follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of erythema with Clinician's Erythema Assessment scaleOne monthThe effect of intradermal BoNT-A treatment on facial erythema was evaluated using the Clinician's Erythema Assessment scale.
Evaluation of erythema using mexameterOne monthEvaluation of the effect of intradermal BoNT-A treatment on the objective erythema value measured by mexameter.
Evaluation of erythema by dermatoscopyOne monthEvaluation of the effect of intradermal BoNT-A treatment on dermatoscopic background erythema.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of the change in vascular structure using videocapillaroscopyOne monthThe secondary objective of the study was to examine the effect of intradermal BoNT-A treatment on the Investigator Global Assessment (poorly defined vasculature and increased vessel diameter were considered poor response; IGA score=-1, localized or complete obliteration of vascular structures was considered good; IGA score=1, no change in vascular structures was considered no response; IGA score=0) scale developed using videocapillaroscopy.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026