Skip to content

3-D Tractography FUS Ablation for Essential Tremor

3-D Tractography Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Essential Tremor

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06331052
Enrollment
24
Registered
2024-03-26
Start date
2024-02-28
Completion date
2028-02-28
Last updated
2026-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Essential Tremor

Brief summary

The investigators propose to advance Vim-FUSA (Ventral Intermediate Nucleus - Focused Ultrasound Ablation) with the support of 3-D tractography, a neuroimaging technique to visually represent nerve tracts within the brain. The investigators hypothesize that 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA will improve the Vim ablation compared to standard Vim-FUSA and prove safe and feasible in the clinical setting. The investigators also hypothesize that intraoperative magnetic resonance (i-MR) monitoring will differentiate ablated tissue from immediate perilesional edema and accurately predict the Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes.

Detailed description

Essential tremor (ET) is a common neurological disorder and a leading cause of functional and psychological disabilities that can be difficult to suppress with oral medications, many of which have considerable side effects limiting adequate dosing. As a result, up to 20% of ET patients cannot achieve satisfactory control of their symptoms and must consider interventional options. Focused ultrasound ablation (FUSA) of the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) is an FDA-approved and Medicare-reimbursed procedure for ET resistant to medications that can selectively ablate the brain area associated with tremor without the need for surgical incisions or anesthesia. The success of Vim-FUSA depends on the ability to accurately ablate 70% of the Vim volume without lesioning neighboring structures, a goal that is complicated by technical challenges in three critical phases of the procedure: planning (identifying the Vim location and extension); delivery (ablating the Vim volume with adequate accuracy); and monitoring (confirming Vim ablation with reliable intraoperative imaging). The investigators propose to advance Vim-FUSA with the support of 3-D tractography, a neuroimaging technique to visually represent nerve tracts within the brain. The investigators hypothesize that 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA will improve the Vim ablation compared to standard Vim-FUSA and prove safe and feasible in the clinical setting. The investigators also hypothesize that intraoperative magnetic resonance (i-MR) monitoring will differentiate ablated tissue from immediate perilesional edema and accurately predict the Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes. Aim 1. Estimate and characterize the improvement in Vim ablation achieved with 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA vs. standard Vim-FUSA in an experimental controlled animal study. Through an experimental animal study, the investigators will characterize the Vim ablation delivered with 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA in one hemisphere (experimental group) vs. standard Vim-FUSA in the opposite hemisphere (control group). Aim 2. Test safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy, and estimate effect size of 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA in a phase-II, two-groups, pre-post interventional human study. In a human study, the investigators will test the safety and feasibility of ablating 70% of the Vim volume while checking for side effects with intraoperative clinical testing. Tremor assessments will be videotaped at baseline and 12 weeks and compared, in a blinded fashion, with age-sex matched controls randomly selected from the video repository of the two FDA-regulated studies of standard Vim-FUSA at baseline and 12 weeks. Aim 3 (Exploratory). Assess the accuracy of i-MR in differentiating tissue ablation from immediate perilesional edema and its utility in predicting Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes. In the experimental animal study, the investigators will estimate and compare the accuracy of conventional and non-conventional i-MR in differentiating tissue necrosis from perilesional edema. In the interventional human study, the investigators will evaluate the utility of i-MR in predicting Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes

Interventions

DEVICEMR-guided Focused Ultrasound Ablation

3-D tractography Vim-FUSA -D tractography Vim-FUSA will be carried out as follows: (a) head shaving and placement of the stereotactic frame (Integra radionics frame, Integra Lifesciences, NJ, USA) secured to the skull with transcutaneous screws; (b) positioning on the procedure table and placement of the ultrasound transducer; (c) acquisition of conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and co-registration with the CT head and 3-D tractography imaging acquired pre-surgically; (d) exploration of the target area with subtherapeutic sonications; (e) intraoperative monitoring with clinical testing of tremor and side effects with a standardized protocol. (f) Therapeutic sonications in the target area to deliver definitive ablation followed by clinical testing of tremor and side effects with a standardized protocol as described in section (e).

Sponsors

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Pittsburgh
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Missouri-Columbia
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of moderate to severe ET agreed upon by at least two movement disorder trained physicians * Symptoms refractory to at least two medications * Stable essential tremor medication regimen for at least 4 weeks prior to screening * Willing and able to participate in all follow-up visits * Willing and able to undergo MR imaging.

Exclusion criteria

* Uncontrolled hypertension * Medically unstable coronary artery disease * Coagulopathy with inability to temporarily stop any antithrombotic medication * Tremor disorders other than ET (e.g., Parkinson disease, traumatic tremor, alcohol or drug dependent tremor that remains after at least 2 weeks of abstinence etc.) * Unwilling or unable to undergo tremor surgery while awake * Significant and non-correctible motion artifact in imaging * Pregnant at the time of enrollment or preoperative evaluation * Dementia * History of psychosis * Prior brain surgery that could influence the focused ultrasound procedure outcomes, including deep brain stimulation * Botulinum toxin injection in the tremor-impacted areas three months prior to the baseline assessment and until 3-months after Vim-FUSA * does not qualify for FDA-approved clinical use based on current FDA labeling except that skull density ratio ≤ 0.4 will be allowed for this study * Any significant issue raised by the neurologist or neurosurgeon that may compromise participant safety or potentially interfere with study interpretation. * non-English speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants without Side Effectsduring the surgical procedureFeasibility is defined as the ability to complete the procedure without side effects.
Absolute Change in TremorBaseline, Month 3The absolute change from baseline to Month 3 follow-up in upper extremity Tremor-Motor scores for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum used to measure treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points. Individual subject's scores at Baseline and 3 Months used to calculate absolute change from baseline and averaged across subjects. High absolute change from baseline is better (shows improvement).
Relative Change in TremorBaseline, Month 3The relative change from baseline to Month 3 follow-up in upper extremity Tremor-Motor scores for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum used to measure treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points. Individual subject's scores at Baseline and 3 Months used to calculate relative change from baseline and averaged across subjects. High relative change from baseline is better (shows improvement).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with Procedure-Related Side Effects3 months after the surgical procedurePrevalence and severity of procedure-related side effects measured by the following: ataxia (SARA), speech disturbance (VHI), sensory loss (SWME), muscle weakness (MRC)
Relative Change in Tremor-Related Quality of Life3 months after the surgical procedureThe Quality of Life Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) will be used to assess tremor-related quality of life. QUEST has scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse disability.
Number of Participants Who Are Satisfied with Treatment3 months after the surgical procedureMeasured using a single question asking about patient satisfaction ranging from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTVibhor Krishna, MD
vibhor_krishna@med.unc.edu+1(919)-445-2410
CONTACTVictoria Scott
Victoria_Scott@med.unc.edu919-966-0864
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORVibhor Krishna, MD

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hll

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 9, 2026