Essential Tremor
Conditions
Brief summary
The investigators propose to advance Vim-FUSA (Ventral Intermediate Nucleus - Focused Ultrasound Ablation) with the support of 3-D tractography, a neuroimaging technique to visually represent nerve tracts within the brain. The investigators hypothesize that 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA will improve the Vim ablation compared to standard Vim-FUSA and prove safe and feasible in the clinical setting. The investigators also hypothesize that intraoperative magnetic resonance (i-MR) monitoring will differentiate ablated tissue from immediate perilesional edema and accurately predict the Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes.
Detailed description
Essential tremor (ET) is a common neurological disorder and a leading cause of functional and psychological disabilities that can be difficult to suppress with oral medications, many of which have considerable side effects limiting adequate dosing. As a result, up to 20% of ET patients cannot achieve satisfactory control of their symptoms and must consider interventional options. Focused ultrasound ablation (FUSA) of the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) is an FDA-approved and Medicare-reimbursed procedure for ET resistant to medications that can selectively ablate the brain area associated with tremor without the need for surgical incisions or anesthesia. The success of Vim-FUSA depends on the ability to accurately ablate 70% of the Vim volume without lesioning neighboring structures, a goal that is complicated by technical challenges in three critical phases of the procedure: planning (identifying the Vim location and extension); delivery (ablating the Vim volume with adequate accuracy); and monitoring (confirming Vim ablation with reliable intraoperative imaging). The investigators propose to advance Vim-FUSA with the support of 3-D tractography, a neuroimaging technique to visually represent nerve tracts within the brain. The investigators hypothesize that 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA will improve the Vim ablation compared to standard Vim-FUSA and prove safe and feasible in the clinical setting. The investigators also hypothesize that intraoperative magnetic resonance (i-MR) monitoring will differentiate ablated tissue from immediate perilesional edema and accurately predict the Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes. Aim 1. Estimate and characterize the improvement in Vim ablation achieved with 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA vs. standard Vim-FUSA in an experimental controlled animal study. Through an experimental animal study, the investigators will characterize the Vim ablation delivered with 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA in one hemisphere (experimental group) vs. standard Vim-FUSA in the opposite hemisphere (control group). Aim 2. Test safety, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy, and estimate effect size of 3-D tractography Vim-FUSA in a phase-II, two-groups, pre-post interventional human study. In a human study, the investigators will test the safety and feasibility of ablating 70% of the Vim volume while checking for side effects with intraoperative clinical testing. Tremor assessments will be videotaped at baseline and 12 weeks and compared, in a blinded fashion, with age-sex matched controls randomly selected from the video repository of the two FDA-regulated studies of standard Vim-FUSA at baseline and 12 weeks. Aim 3 (Exploratory). Assess the accuracy of i-MR in differentiating tissue ablation from immediate perilesional edema and its utility in predicting Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes. In the experimental animal study, the investigators will estimate and compare the accuracy of conventional and non-conventional i-MR in differentiating tissue necrosis from perilesional edema. In the interventional human study, the investigators will evaluate the utility of i-MR in predicting Vim-FUSA clinical outcomes
Interventions
3-D tractography Vim-FUSA -D tractography Vim-FUSA will be carried out as follows: (a) head shaving and placement of the stereotactic frame (Integra radionics frame, Integra Lifesciences, NJ, USA) secured to the skull with transcutaneous screws; (b) positioning on the procedure table and placement of the ultrasound transducer; (c) acquisition of conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and co-registration with the CT head and 3-D tractography imaging acquired pre-surgically; (d) exploration of the target area with subtherapeutic sonications; (e) intraoperative monitoring with clinical testing of tremor and side effects with a standardized protocol. (f) Therapeutic sonications in the target area to deliver definitive ablation followed by clinical testing of tremor and side effects with a standardized protocol as described in section (e).
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of moderate to severe ET agreed upon by at least two movement disorder trained physicians * Symptoms refractory to at least two medications * Stable essential tremor medication regimen for at least 4 weeks prior to screening * Willing and able to participate in all follow-up visits * Willing and able to undergo MR imaging.
Exclusion criteria
* Uncontrolled hypertension * Medically unstable coronary artery disease * Coagulopathy with inability to temporarily stop any antithrombotic medication * Tremor disorders other than ET (e.g., Parkinson disease, traumatic tremor, alcohol or drug dependent tremor that remains after at least 2 weeks of abstinence etc.) * Unwilling or unable to undergo tremor surgery while awake * Significant and non-correctible motion artifact in imaging * Pregnant at the time of enrollment or preoperative evaluation * Dementia * History of psychosis * Prior brain surgery that could influence the focused ultrasound procedure outcomes, including deep brain stimulation * Botulinum toxin injection in the tremor-impacted areas three months prior to the baseline assessment and until 3-months after Vim-FUSA * does not qualify for FDA-approved clinical use based on current FDA labeling except that skull density ratio ≤ 0.4 will be allowed for this study * Any significant issue raised by the neurologist or neurosurgeon that may compromise participant safety or potentially interfere with study interpretation. * non-English speaking
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants without Side Effects | during the surgical procedure | Feasibility is defined as the ability to complete the procedure without side effects. |
| Absolute Change in Tremor | Baseline, Month 3 | The absolute change from baseline to Month 3 follow-up in upper extremity Tremor-Motor scores for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum used to measure treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points. Individual subject's scores at Baseline and 3 Months used to calculate absolute change from baseline and averaged across subjects. High absolute change from baseline is better (shows improvement). |
| Relative Change in Tremor | Baseline, Month 3 | The relative change from baseline to Month 3 follow-up in upper extremity Tremor-Motor scores for the treated side is a sub-scale of Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) Part A and Part B sum used to measure treated-side upper extremity tremor changes over time. Tremor-motor scores range from 0-32 points. Individual subject's scores at Baseline and 3 Months used to calculate relative change from baseline and averaged across subjects. High relative change from baseline is better (shows improvement). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants with Procedure-Related Side Effects | 3 months after the surgical procedure | Prevalence and severity of procedure-related side effects measured by the following: ataxia (SARA), speech disturbance (VHI), sensory loss (SWME), muscle weakness (MRC) |
| Relative Change in Tremor-Related Quality of Life | 3 months after the surgical procedure | The Quality of Life Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) will be used to assess tremor-related quality of life. QUEST has scores ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse disability. |
| Number of Participants Who Are Satisfied with Treatment | 3 months after the surgical procedure | Measured using a single question asking about patient satisfaction ranging from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hll