Skip to content

Validity and Reliability of Trunk Strength Device

Validity and Reliability of Trunk Muscle Strength Assessements With Isometric Dynamometry

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06330129
Acronym
PEGASUS
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-03-26
Start date
2024-11-15
Completion date
2025-04-01
Last updated
2025-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trunk Muscle Strength

Keywords

Trunk muscle strength, Isometric device, Pegasus, Validity, Reliability, Muscle Activation

Brief summary

The study aims to evaluate the accuracy and consistency of assessing trunk muscle strength using an isometric device (Pegasus, Leipzig, Germany). Thirty healthy volunteers will undergo maximal isometric strength testing with the device, repeated one week later to assess repeatability. Surface electrodes will measure muscle activation, while MRI scans will assess structural condition.

Detailed description

The aim of the study is to assess the validity and repeatability of trunk muscle strength evaluation using an isometric device (Pegasus, Leipzig, Germany) and to investigate it. Thirty healthy volunteer participants will undergo testing of maximal isometric (non-moving) strength using this device. The same strength measurement procedure will be repeated one week later for all participants to determine if the measurements are repeatable, i.e., if the device is capable of providing similar strength data in two closely timed measurements. To assess whether the device actually provides reliable strength data for the trunk muscles, surface electrodes will be additionally placed on the involved muscles to understand the extent of neural activation of these muscles during the test. Additionally, an MRI examination will be conducted for all study participants to assess the structural condition of the trunk muscles.

Interventions

DEVICECTT Pegasus

The intervention aims to assess the construct validity of trunk flexor, extensor, and rotator muscle strength using the CTT PEGASUS isometric dynamometer (Leipzig, Germany). This involves correlating muscle strength measured isometrically with its physiological determinants: MRI-based anatomical cross-sectional area (CSA) in the lumbar region and muscle activation measured via surface electromyography (EMG) of spine and trunk muscles. Additionally, the intervention will assess the test-retest reliability of isometric strength of trunk flexors, extensors, and rotators.

Sponsors

Balgrist Campus AG
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Schulthess Klinik
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* both male and female subjects * age between 18 and 59 years * BMI \< 30 kg/m2 * cognitively intact (self-reported) * autonomous walking

Exclusion criteria

* age under 18 years or over 60 years * any prior spinal surgery or other musculoskeletal surgery having an impact on movement * acute or chronic back pain in the last 6 months(self-reported) * pregnancy (self-reported) * inability to perform the planned set of activities included in the study (e.g. maximal voluntary contraction torque test) * inability to give consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
maximal isometric trunk muscle strength1 hourThe computer-assisted test and trainig device (CTT) PEGASUS provides data on back muscle strength in isometric conditions, which constitutes the main endpoint of the present project.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MRI muscle morphology0.5-1hourthe anatomical crosssectional area (CSA) of trunk muscles (multifidus, erector spinae, rectus abdominis, and obliquus externus abdominis) evaluated through an abdominal MRI.
Electromyography (EMG) activity1hourthe root mean square EMG activity recorded during maximal and submaximal voluntary contractions of respective muscles.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026