Skip to content

Refined Nursing in Rehabilitation Training

Effect of Refined Nursing in Rehabilitation Training for Patients With Brain Injury During the Recovery Period: An Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06329934
Enrollment
96
Registered
2024-03-26
Start date
2022-05-01
Completion date
2024-01-01
Last updated
2024-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Injuries

Keywords

Refined nursing, Coma, Rehabilitation training

Brief summary

This study is to explore the clinical effect of refined nursing in rehabilitation training for patients with brain injury during the recovery period. Patients in the control group were provided with routine nursing intervention, while patients in the study group adopted a nursing mode based on the concept of refinement treatment. Comparison was made in terms of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, cognitive function score, functional independence score, nursing satisfaction, and incidence of complications.

Detailed description

This study is to explore the clinical effect of refined nursing in rehabilitation training for patients with brain injury during the recovery period. The subjects of the study were 96 patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). According to the order of visits, there were 48 patients in the study group and the control group, respectively.Patients in the control group were provided with routine nursing intervention, while patients in the study group adopted a nursing mode based on the concept of refinement treatment. Comparison was made in terms of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, cognitive function score, functional independence score, nursing satisfaction, and incidence of complications.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEstablishment of a hierarchical monitoring and management team

To be specific, the head nurse served as the team leader to conduct comprehensive macro supervision; moreover, there were 3 responsible team leaders and 6 responsible nurses, all of whom had rich clinical nursing experience and solid theoretical knowledge of pressure injury. Consequently, a joint-action mechanism of the head nurse - responsible team leader - responsible nurses was developed to facilitate the unification of the training of nursing content, precautions, etc.

BEHAVIORALAssessment of pressure injury

Based on the postoperative coma of patients, the Braden assessment scale was applied to effectively evaluate patients from six dimensions of sensory perception, moisture, activity mode, mobility, nutrition, friction, and shear. The total score was 23 points. Patients scoring 13\ 14 points were evaluated by Braden once per week; and those scoring ≤12 points were evaluated at a frequency of 3d/ time.

BEHAVIORALCommunication

Through intensive face-to-face communication with family members, timely information on the surgical effect, mechanism of pressure injury, preventive measures, and clinical manifestations through intuitive methods such as PPT and video, family members were taught with basic knowledge of pressure injury, and guided to inform medical staff in a timely manner when patients had symptoms of pressure ulcer. Simultaneously, by case sharing and positive suggestions, family members were supported to alleviate their concerns and improve their coordination with treatment

BEHAVIORALIntervention for pressure ulcer

For patients with a Braden score of \>14 points, attention should be paid to keeping skin dry and clean, regularly changing bed sheets and bedding (once per day). Patients with Braden score of 13-14 points should be provided with sponge mattresses, increased times of turning over once per 2 hours, and soft pillows or foam dressings at the site of occipital protuberance to relieve pressure and prevent pressure injury. For patients with Braden score ≤12 points, medical staff should repeatedly emphasize to their families the harm of pressure injury to postoperative recovery.

After regaining consciousness with stable vital signs, patients received rehabilitation training following the principle of association of activity and inertia in a regular order. Patients were guided to perform upper limb movements, joint flexion, lower limb flexion and extension, as well as daily training such as washing face, rinsing mouth, and dressing at a frequency of 3\ 4 times/d. Moreover, patients were advised to minimize violent behaviors such as laughing and talking loudly

BEHAVIORALintroduction of the current patient's condition to family members

timely introduction of the current patient's condition to family members to alleviate their concerns

BEHAVIORALmaintaining appropriate temperature and humidity in the ward

maintaining appropriate temperature (20 ℃\ 22 ℃) and humidity (60.0%\ 70.0%) in the ward

BEHAVIORALcareful observation of vital signs in patients

careful observation of vital signs such as heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and blood pressure in patients

Sponsors

Xinxiang Central Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
33 Years to 43 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients diagnosed with severe TBI through imaging examinations such as head CT and magnetic resonance imaging * patients with surgical indications * patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤8 points * patients with complete clinical data * patients with written informed consent provided by family members

Exclusion criteria

* patients with organic lesions of major organs such as liver and kidney * patients with contraindications for surgery * patients with primary diseases such as cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarction * patients with combined or multiple injuries * patients with respiratory failure * patients whose family members had cognitive impairment or abnormal mental behaviors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
GCS scoresone day before the interventionThe highest GCS score was 15 points, indicating clear consciousness; while patients with 13-15, 9-12, and ≤8 points were classified as mild, moderate consciousness disorder, and coma, respectively. Patients with lower scores might indicate more serious consciousness disorder
cognitive function scoresone day before the interventionCognitive function was evaluated using the Chinese version of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Exam (NCSE) to assess the cognitive function of patients before and 2 months after rehabilitation treatment. This scale includes 10 items, i.e., spatial orientation (12 points), concentration (8 points), understandability (6 points), retelling (12 points), naming (8 points), spatial construction (6 points), memory (12 points), computing (4 points), similarity (8 points), and judgment (6 points)
functional independence scoresone day before the interventionFunctional Independence Measure (FIM), utilizing a 7-point ordinal scale, was employed to assess the functional independence of two groups of patients before and 2 months after rehabilitation treatment. FIM measures independent performance in self-care, sphincter control, mobility, locomotion, communication, social cognition, etc. The minimum score is 18 points, and the maximum score is 126 points (91 points for motor function and 35 points for cognitive function)
Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS)one day before the interventionThe Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scale (NSNS) was used to survey patient's nursing satisfaction. This scale measures patient's satisfaction with nursing care from 19 items, including nurse work ability, communication attitude, psychological counseling, nursing support, safety management, etc. It uses a 1-5 point scoring system, with a maximum possible score of 19-95 points. A score of ≥77, 58\ 76, 39\ 57 and ≤38 points indicated very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat satisfied, and dissatisfied, respectively. Satisfaction rate= (Cases of very satisfied + satisfied + somewhat satisfied)÷total cases
incidence of adverse reactionsone day before the interventionIncidence (%)=Number of patients with complications/48×100%

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026