Skip to content

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Inpatients

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Medical and Open-Heart Surgical Patients

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06329297
Enrollment
0
Registered
2024-03-25
Start date
2025-10-01
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2026-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperglycemia

Keywords

continuous glucose monitor, CGM

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to contribute to current research regarding the feasibility and accuracy of CGM in the hospital setting for both the medical and cardiovascular intensive care (ICU) patient populations.

Detailed description

The use of continuous glucose monitors (CGM) in the outpatient setting has dramatically increased as these devices continue to improve in both ease of use, accessibility, and accuracy. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) clearance of certain devices has now been granted in both pregnancy and automated insulin delivery systems. As the world has embraced the safety and efficacy of continuous glucose monitors in the outpatient setting, health systems have turned attention to the potential of utilizing these devices to improve glycemic control in the hospital setting. With the announcement of the FDA granting enforcement discretion regarding the use of CGM technology in the hospital setting during the COVID-19 pandemic, the result was an abundance of research evaluating the potential of CGM longevity in the hospital setting. The Standards of Care in Diabetes: 2023 reported that "preliminary data suggests that CGM can significantly improve glycemic management and other hospital outcomes." Additionally, a systematic review of 32 studies evaluated the accuracy of CGM in the intensive care unit, with a consensus of moderate to good accuracy. CGM in the hospital setting could provide a valuable tool in reducing hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and increasing time spent in normoglycemia. Other potential benefits of CGM include a broader view of glucose patterns, capture of asymptomatic hypoglycemia, reduced length of stay, and decreased cost. The Diabetes Technology Society organized the Hospital Consensus Guideline Panel in 2020, with the final report including the recommendation for additional research on the accuracy, data management, and patient-centered outcomes of CGM use in the inpatient setting.

Interventions

DEVICECGM monitor

blood glucose sensor used to monitor interstitial glucose

Sponsors

Parkview Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admitted patients 18 years of age or older * Glucose management per Glucommander and/or receiving POC blood glucose testing * Patients admitted to Medical 6 or elective or urgent open-heart surgery patients admitted to the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit (CVICU)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients less than 18 years of age * Pregnant or currently breastfeeding * Prisoners * Patients unable to consent in English. * Patients with a preexisting insulin pump on admission * Active skin infection at the insertion site(s)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CGM vs point of care test (POCT) glucosefrom date of admission up to 7 daysContinuous interstitial glucose monitor readings compared to point of care capillary blood glucose readings

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Slow downward trend arrow on CGM devicefrom date of admission up to 7 daysimpact on hypoglycemia events

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORJan R Powers

Parkview Health

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 24, 2026