Skip to content

Efficacy of Different Low Level Laser Therapy Sessions

Efficacy of Different Low Level Laser Therapy Sessions in Management of Masseter Muscle Trigger Points

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06327204
Enrollment
90
Registered
2024-03-25
Start date
2023-03-01
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2024-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myofascial Pain Syndrome

Keywords

Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial, Laser therapy

Brief summary

Myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome is one of the common causes of non-odontogenic pain in the head and neck region. It accounts for 40-60% of the adult population. Different treatment modalities had been reported to release the trigger point within the muscles of mastication in order to reduce pain and allow recovery of the function.

Detailed description

Low-level laser therapy has been a research focus in past few years as it provides effective and conservative treatment modality with minimal patient discomfort. LLLT promotes the release of endogenous opioids, enhance tissue repair and cellular respiration, increase vasodilatation and pain relief Recent systematic review and meta-analysis had reported that the available evidence didn't allow clinicians to draw firm conclusions on effective dosage. This study aimed to investigate the effect of different LLLT sessions' number on pain, maximum mouth opening and quality of life in patients with masseter muscle trigger points.

Interventions

DEVICE940-nm diode laser / one session

laser therapy using a 940-nm diode laser / one session per week

DEVICE940-nm diode laser / two session

laser therapy using a 940-nm diode laser / two session per week

DEVICE940-nm diode laser/ three session

laser therapy using a 940-nm diode laser / three session per week

Sponsors

October 6 University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. definite diagnosis of myofascial pain based on the DC/TMD criteria with a referral 2. presence of one or more trigger points in the masseter muscle 3. no history of any invasive procedures of the related masseter muscle.

Exclusion criteria

1. any painful conditions affecting the orofacial region 2. any systemic diseases that could masticatory function (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis and epilepsy) 3. pregnancy and lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain score8 weeksa 10-point visual analogue score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
maximum mouth opening8 weeksmeasuring the interincisal distance between the upper and lower central incisors
quality of life questioner8 weeksOral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-14) containing 14 questions divided into seven domains of oral health

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026