Skip to content

Thermal Pulsation Versus Warm Compress Treatment for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Thermal Pulsation Versus Warm Compress Treatment for Signs and Symptoms of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06326931
Enrollment
68
Registered
2024-03-22
Start date
2022-06-24
Completion date
2023-06-22
Last updated
2024-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Brief summary

This study aimed to assess the treatment outcome differences between a single, in-office bilateral treatment with the thermal pulsation system and twice-daily, 10-minute applications of the warm compress mask at home for 8 weeks.

Detailed description

This prospective, single-center, single-masked, randomized, controlled clinical trial compared the Systane iLux handheld thermal pulsation system with a warm compress mask (Bruder Moist Heat Eye Compress, Bruder Healthcare, Alpharetta, GA, USA) for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). Subjects aged 18 or older were randomized 1:1 to either a single in-office thermal pulsation treatment or twice-daily use of the warm compress mask, with both eyes undergoing the same treatment. Enrollment criteria included Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score \>23, total meibomian gland secretion (MGS) score \< or =12 in the lower lid of each eye, and tear break-up time (TBUT) \< 10 seconds. TBUT, MGS, and corneal staining scores were evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks, and 8 weeks. Symptoms were evaluated using the OSDI questionnaire at baseline, 2 weeks, and 8 weeks.

Interventions

Single, in-office bilateral treatment with Systane iLux thermal pulsation

Twice daily, 10-minute at-home treatment with Bruder warm compress mask for 8 weeks

Sponsors

Jacksoneye
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The clinician evaluating MGS score was masked to subject treatment assignment

Intervention model description

Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* history of self-reported dry eye symptoms for 3 months prior to study enrollment * baseline OSDI score of 23 or greater ( * MGS score of 12 ior less in the lower eyelid of each eye * TBUT \<10 seconds * willing and able to abstain from using any new ocular lubricants

Exclusion criteria

* diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction or rheumatoid arthritis * history of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK); any other ocular surgery within the previous 12 months * abnormal lid anatomy or active lid lesions * use of topical glaucoma medications, medications affecting the central nervous system, or hormonal drugs within the previous month * active ocular infection * pterygium * planned use of contact lenses, topical antibiotics, steroids, or immunomodulating drops * CDVA worse than 0.2 logMAR

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in MGS score for the worse eyebaseline to Week 8Change in MGS score for the worse eye

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in MGS score for the worse eyebaseline to Week 2Change in MGS score for the worse eye
Change in OSDI scoreBaseline to Week 2Change in OSDI score
Incidence of adverse events8 weeksIncidence of adverse events

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026