Graded Motor Imagery, Stroke, Action Observation Training, Motor Imagery
Conditions
Keywords
graded motor imagery, action observation training, Stroke, hemiplegia, upper limb function, activities of daily living, life quality
Brief summary
In the study, movement observation training, Modified Graded Motor Imaging Training, which includes upper extremity functional exercises, and Graded Motor Imaging Training, where the standard protocol is applied, will be used in stroke patients to improve their upper extremity motor functions and daily lives. It is aimed to present it on an evidence-based basis by investigating its effects on Daily Living Activity, quality of life, upper extremity-specific right/left lateralization performance, mental stopwatch performance and motor imagery skills.
Detailed description
At study is planned as a combination of action observation training, motor imagery and graded motor imagery training, which have come to the fore in recent years and whose importance increases with each passing year. Additionally, its preferability in treatment will be investigated by comparing it with Graded Motor Imagery training, in which the standard protocol is applied. It is anticipated that treatment protocols will shed light on future studies. The hypotheses of the study are as follows: Hypothesis 1: Modified Graded Motor Imagery training is more effective than Graded Motor Imagery training and conventional treatment in improving upper extremity motor functions in individuals with stroke. Hypothesis 2: Modified Graded Motor Imagery training is more effective than Graded Motor Imagery training and conventional treatment in improving daily living activities in individuals with stroke. Hypothesis 3: Modified Graded Motor Imagery training is more effective than Graded Motor Imagery training and conventional treatment in improving the quality of life in individuals with stroke. Hypothesis 4: Modified Graded Motor Imagery training is more effective than Graded Motor Imagery training and conventional treatment in improving motor imagery skills in individuals with stroke. Design of the study: The study was designed as a randomized controlled study.
Interventions
OTHERModified Graded Motor Imagery and Conventional Treatment Group
A modified form of graded motor imagery training and conventional rehabilitation will be applied.
OTHERGraded Motor Imagery and Conventional Treatment Group
Graded motor imagery training and conventional rehabilitation will be applied.
conventional rehabilitation will be applied.
Sponsors
Inonu University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Hemiplegia was observed after CVO, According to the Edinburgh Handedness Questionnaire, those who actively use their right extremity, Those with right hemisphere involvement, Those aged 18 and over, Having been diagnosed with stroke at least 1 month ago and at most 6 months ago, Middle cerebral artery involvement, Having a Standardized Mini Mental Test score of 24 or above, having a Stage 2b or above according to Eggers staging, Able to actively control hands, wrists and fingers and perform the release reflex Those who want to participate in the study voluntarily and Individuals with informed consent will be included in the study.
Exclusion criteria
Those with major neurological, orthopedic or rheumatological disorders that affect upper extremity function other than stroke (Polyneuropathy, Parkinson's, Multiple Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, etc.). Those with upper extremity amputation, Uncontrolled arrhythmia, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable cardiac status Active malignancy and receiving chemo/radiotherapy related to it Uncooperative due to aphasia or cognitive impairment Individuals with vision and hearing problems Having a communication problem that may prevent implementation of the evaluations and/or treatment program Individuals who do not allow mental evaluation, cannot fill out the scales, and are illiterate will not be included in the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Rating Scale | before treatment, 2 months, 4 months | The scale is a widely used, reliable and valid test to evaluate paretic upper extremity motor impairment in stroke patients. From this scale, where each parameter is scored between 0-2 points, a maximum score of 66 can be obtained, and high scores indicate good motor functions. |
| Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) | before treatment, 2 months, 4 months | WMFT is used to evaluate motor skill in patients with upper extremity motor dysfunction. The 15 functional activities evaluated are scored between 0-5 points and the functional skill score is calculated by taking the average of the total score. Higher scores indicate better functional ability. In the performance time section, how long each activity took is recorded. A maximum of 120 seconds is allowed to complete an activity. If the activity cannot be completed within this time, the performance time is recorded as 120 seconds. |
| Modified Barthel Index | before treatment, 2 months, 4 months | MBI, which is used to measure the independence of individuals in daily living activities, emerged by modifying the Barthel Index. MBI includes 10 items related to activities of daily living. Total score is between 0-100. As the score increases, individuals' independence in daily living activities increases. |
| Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale | before treatment, 2 months, 4 months | It consists of a total of 49 items for 12 subcategories (mobility, fitness, upper extremity functionality, work/productivity, mood, self-care, social roles, family roles, language, vision, thinking and personality) that evaluate the quality of life of individuals with stroke. The higher the total score, the better the stroke individual's quality of life. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Lateralization Assessment | before treatment, 2 months, 4 months | Right/left lateralization performance of the upper extremity will be evaluated with the "Recognise™" application developed by the Neuro Orthapedic Institute. The "Recognise™ Hand" and "Recognise™ Shoulder" sections of this application and the "Vanilla" part of these sections will be used. Accuracy rates and reaction time in the application will be recorded. An increase in the accuracy rate indicates that lateralization performance has improved. |
| Mental Chronometry Time | before treatment, 2 months, 4 months | It will be used to evaluate the chronometric aspect of motor imagery. You will be given the task of wearing and folding a T-shirt for the mental stopwatch period.First, the motor imagery task will be performed. The time written on the screen is recorded by the observer. For the physical phase of the test, the same application is actually carried out and the time is recorded with the help of a stopwatch. Mental stopwatch rate will be calculated. Mental stopwatch ratio = (Time in which the movement is physically performed - Time in which the movement is performed with imagination) / Time in which the movement is physically performed. |
| Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KGIA) | before treatment, 2 months, 4 months | CSIA will be used to evaluate motor imagery skills. After experiencing the movement in reality, he will be asked to imagine himself watching the same movement as if it were actually performed. Participants will evaluate the quality of the image in the visualization by giving points between 1 and 5, including "1 (no image)" and "5 (clear as the original)". An increase in the score indicates improvement. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed