Educational Problems
Conditions
Keywords
Augmented Reality, Advanced Cardiac Life Support, Clinical Simulation, Medical Education
Brief summary
This is a non-inferiority, international, controlled trial that aims to evaluate the progression of physicians and residents through an Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) clinical simulated scenario. The study's primary objective is to compare the performance outcomes between two groups: participants in the traditional in-person simulation and those immersed in the Augmented Reality (AR) scenario
Interventions
BEHAVIORALAugmented Reality simulation
Augmented simulation of medical crisis scenarios
BEHAVIORALIn Person simulation
In Person simulation of medical crisis scenarios
Sponsors
Stanford University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Brazilian resident
Exclusion criteria
* a history of severe motion sickness * currently have nausea * a history of seizures * wear corrective glasses.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of Technical Skill (TS) and Non Technical Skill (NTS) Performance | immediately after simulation | Measured with Instrument for the evaluation of advanced life support performance. The instrument consists of 26 items, which are rated on a scale from +2 to -2. A total assessment score of performance is given based on a scale from 0 to 10 (0=poor, 10=excellent) at the end of the instrument. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Reassessment of Non Technical Skill (NTS) with Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) | immediately after simulation | Measured with individual Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS). The BARS scoring system uses four categories assessing situation awareness, decision-making, communication and teamwork. The score ranges from 1 and 9 (1 = poor and 9 = excellent) |
| Evaluation of the AR system's usability | immediately after simulation | Measured with the System Usability Scale (SUS). The scale has 10 items. Scores ranges from 1-5 (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree) |
| Evaluation of the AR system's ergonomics | immediately after simulation | Measured with the ISO 9241-400 Assessment of human-ergonomic factors. The scale has 6 items. Scores ranges from 1-5 (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree) |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed