Skip to content

Comparative Evaluation of the Results of Facet Joint Injections

Comparative Evaluation of the Results of Facet Joint Injections Performed by Using Fluoroscopy, Ultrasound Guidance and Anatomic Location Administered to the Patients With Facet Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06325631
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-03-22
Start date
2023-01-02
Completion date
2024-04-30
Last updated
2024-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Facet Syndrome of Lumbar Spine, Low Back Pain, Mechanical

Keywords

facet joint syndrome, low back pain, fluoroscopy, ultrasound

Brief summary

Low back pain affects 60 to 90% of the total population. It is one of the most common causes of disability in adults. Low back pain can be originated from a wide variety of structures, and the facet joint is one of these structures. It is thought that 21 to 41% of low back pain originates from the facet joint. A wide variety of conservative treatments, including intra-articular injections, are used to treat low back pain originating from the facet joint. However, there is still no consensus on the most effective treatment method. With appropriate patient selection, facet joint injections can provide significant improvements in patients' pain scores. After Goldthwait defined the facet joint concept in 1911, Ghormley defined facet joint syndrome in 1933. The source of pain in 40-50% of patients is the lumbar facet joints. Innervation of the lumbar facet joints is provided by the medial branches of the dorsal roots of the spinal nerves. In 1975, Shealy described the coagulation of the articular nerve support of the spinal facet joints with the radiofrequency method. These methods have been further developed over time. The results of facet joint injections are satisfactory in well-selected patient groups. It has been shown that intra-articular steroid injection to the facet joint is superior to systemic steroid use in patients with low back pain. In this study, it was aimed to methodically compare the facet joint injections applied to patients diagnosed with facet syndrome in the outpatient clinic of the Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital in terms of patient pain scores, application time, effort spent and patient anxiety. Intra-articular injections will be performed under by fluoroscopy or ultrasound guidance or anatomic location.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIntra-articular injection to lumbar facet joint

to treat low back pain caused by facet joint syndrome

Sponsors

Oznur Uzun
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with facet joint syndrome diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant patients * breastfeeding patients * patients with cardiac pacemaker

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue ScaleVAS will be applied to the patients before the procedure and at the first and twelfth week after the procedurePain intensity will be measured with Visual Analogue Scale, which is used to measure musculoskeletal pain with very good reliability and validity. Visual Analogue Scale is between 0-10 cm. 0 means no pain, 10 means the most severe pain.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026