Anesthesia; Adverse Effect, Emergence Delirium
Conditions
Keywords
Anesthesia induction
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to compare the impact of common (standard of care) language vs positive language used by clinicians during inhalational induction of anesthesia on anxiety and negative behaviors in children. This is a prospective randomized parallel group trial. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the common/standard language group or the positive language group.
Interventions
The anesthesiologist taking care of the patient will use scripted common/standard language during the induction.
The anesthesiologist taking care of the patient will use scripted positive language during the induction.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* ASA 1 and 2 (Healthy Patients) * Non-emergent cases * 5-10 year olds * Patients receiving inhalational induction
Exclusion criteria
* Non-English speaking * History of prior inhalational inductions * Hearing difficulty * Behavioral difficulty (Autism, Oppositional Defiant Disorder) * Patients receiving premedication other than midazolam
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Induction compliance | Through Study Completion about 1 day | Compliance of children during mask induction as measured by the Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC) from the time patient enters the operating room until loss of lid reflex |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Length of induction | Through Study Completion about 1 day | Time from start of induction to loss of lid reflex |
| Verbal refusal of mask | Through Study Completion about 1 day | Patient verbal expression of refusal of the mask during start of induction until loss of lid reflex |
Countries
United States