Skip to content

Soft Tissue Stability in Immediate Implant Placement Using (VST) Versus Conventional Flap in Type II Extraction Sockets

Soft Tissue Stability in Immediate Implant Placement Using the Vestibular Socket Therapy Versus Conventional Flap in Type II Extraction Sockets in the Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06324747
Enrollment
16
Registered
2024-03-22
Start date
2023-10-23
Completion date
2024-12-01
Last updated
2025-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Badly Broken Tooth in a Socket Type II Eligible to be Replaced by Immediate Implant

Brief summary

This study compare between the vestibular socket therapy (VST) and the traditional mucoperiosteal flap reflection in immediate implant placement in type II extraction socket in the esthetic zone. The technique of vestibular socket therapy (VST), introduced by Elaskry, enables the placement of implants immediately while simultaneously rehabilitating the entire socket, resulting in excellent esthetic and functional outcomes that meet the expectations of patients. VST involves socket augmentation through a minimally invasive vestibular access incision, eliminating the need for the traditional mucoperiosteal flap reflection, regardless of the extent of socket compromise.

Detailed description

Several methods have been suggested for the treatment of class 2 socket types with immediate implant placement. One such technique is the immediate dento-alveolar restoration (IDR), which involves the incorporation of a tuberosity bone graft into the buccal defect, restoring the missing buccal bone walls. However, this technique has some limitations, including the lack of graft stabilization to the host bed, the high rate of bone graft remodeling, and the limited availability of tuberosity bone when wisdom teeth are present. In contrast, Buser D. extensively researched the early implant placement method. This approach involves extracting the tooth and then waiting for a delay period of 8-12 weeks. According to the authors, this timeframe allows for the development of ample keratinized tissues, the elimination of socket infection, and the occurrence of post-extraction bone remodeling. In contrast, both early placement and contour augmentation procedures have demonstrated certain drawbacks. These include the collapse of socket walls in both horizontal and vertical directions after tooth extraction, the need for a lengthy treatment duration that can extend up to 8 months, the challenges of maintaining provisional restorations during this extended period, and the potential for post-restorative socket tissue recession due to the reflection of the mucoperiosteal flap . As a result, achieving a successful esthetic treatment outcome becomes difficult to predict. The technique of vestibular socket therapy (VST), introduced by Elaskry et al. , enables the placement of implants immediately while simultaneously rehabilitating the entire socket, resulting in excellent esthetic and functional outcomes that meet the expectations of patients. VST involves socket augmentation through a minimally invasive vestibular access incision, eliminating the need for the traditional mucoperiosteal flap reflection, regardless of the extent of socket compromise . The procedure involves making a horizontal incision in the vestibule at the base of the mucogingival junction of the extracted tooth. This is followed by implant placement without the need for a flap, grafting the compromised socket walls through the vestibular access incision. The labial bone defect, which has been grafted with a bone graft, is then protected using a cortical equine membrane, and finally, the socket opening is sealed with a customized healing collar.

Interventions

Vestibular socket therapy will be used for the intervention.

PROCEDUREconventional full thickness flap

reflecting the mucoperiosteum to access the extraction socket

Sponsors

British University In Egypt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Due to the differences in techniques, the operating surgeon can not be blinded to the procedure

Intervention model description

Two equal parallel groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio to receive either vestibular socket therapy (test group) or to be treated with conventional mucoperiosteal flap (control group).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Hopeless maxillary tooth in the esthetic region missing coronal tooth structure * Type II socket (deficient labial plate of bone and intact overlying soft tissues) * Adequate palatal bone, ≥ 3 mm apical bone to engage the immediately placed implants

Exclusion criteria

* Smokers * Pregnant women * Patients with systemic diseases * History of chemotherapy or radiotherapy within the past 2 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Soft Tissue Stability8 monthsit will be measured digitally using the intraoral scanner. A preoperative scanning, immediate postoperative, 2 months postoperative and 8 months postoperative scanning will be done. Tool to be used: 3shape trios 4 what will be assessed: * gingival recession * loss of interdental papillae height Data will be measured in millimeters

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone Regeneration8 monthsmeasuring the thickness of the labial plate of bone. It will be measured preoperatively, immediate postoperative to measure the amount of the augmented bone, 2 months postoperatively and 8 months post operative. Tool to be used: cone beam computed tomography (cbct)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pink Esthetic Score (PES)8 monthsThe PES is based on seven variables: mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft tissue color and soft tissue texture. Each variable will be assessed with a 2-1-0 score, with 2 being the best and 0 being the poorest score.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026