Badly Broken Tooth in a Socket Type II Eligible to be Replaced by Immediate Implant
Conditions
Brief summary
This study compare between the vestibular socket therapy (VST) and the traditional mucoperiosteal flap reflection in immediate implant placement in type II extraction socket in the esthetic zone. The technique of vestibular socket therapy (VST), introduced by Elaskry, enables the placement of implants immediately while simultaneously rehabilitating the entire socket, resulting in excellent esthetic and functional outcomes that meet the expectations of patients. VST involves socket augmentation through a minimally invasive vestibular access incision, eliminating the need for the traditional mucoperiosteal flap reflection, regardless of the extent of socket compromise.
Detailed description
Several methods have been suggested for the treatment of class 2 socket types with immediate implant placement. One such technique is the immediate dento-alveolar restoration (IDR), which involves the incorporation of a tuberosity bone graft into the buccal defect, restoring the missing buccal bone walls. However, this technique has some limitations, including the lack of graft stabilization to the host bed, the high rate of bone graft remodeling, and the limited availability of tuberosity bone when wisdom teeth are present. In contrast, Buser D. extensively researched the early implant placement method. This approach involves extracting the tooth and then waiting for a delay period of 8-12 weeks. According to the authors, this timeframe allows for the development of ample keratinized tissues, the elimination of socket infection, and the occurrence of post-extraction bone remodeling. In contrast, both early placement and contour augmentation procedures have demonstrated certain drawbacks. These include the collapse of socket walls in both horizontal and vertical directions after tooth extraction, the need for a lengthy treatment duration that can extend up to 8 months, the challenges of maintaining provisional restorations during this extended period, and the potential for post-restorative socket tissue recession due to the reflection of the mucoperiosteal flap . As a result, achieving a successful esthetic treatment outcome becomes difficult to predict. The technique of vestibular socket therapy (VST), introduced by Elaskry et al. , enables the placement of implants immediately while simultaneously rehabilitating the entire socket, resulting in excellent esthetic and functional outcomes that meet the expectations of patients. VST involves socket augmentation through a minimally invasive vestibular access incision, eliminating the need for the traditional mucoperiosteal flap reflection, regardless of the extent of socket compromise . The procedure involves making a horizontal incision in the vestibule at the base of the mucogingival junction of the extracted tooth. This is followed by implant placement without the need for a flap, grafting the compromised socket walls through the vestibular access incision. The labial bone defect, which has been grafted with a bone graft, is then protected using a cortical equine membrane, and finally, the socket opening is sealed with a customized healing collar.
Interventions
Vestibular socket therapy will be used for the intervention.
reflecting the mucoperiosteum to access the extraction socket
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Due to the differences in techniques, the operating surgeon can not be blinded to the procedure
Intervention model description
Two equal parallel groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio to receive either vestibular socket therapy (test group) or to be treated with conventional mucoperiosteal flap (control group).
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Hopeless maxillary tooth in the esthetic region missing coronal tooth structure * Type II socket (deficient labial plate of bone and intact overlying soft tissues) * Adequate palatal bone, ≥ 3 mm apical bone to engage the immediately placed implants
Exclusion criteria
* Smokers * Pregnant women * Patients with systemic diseases * History of chemotherapy or radiotherapy within the past 2 years.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Soft Tissue Stability | 8 months | it will be measured digitally using the intraoral scanner. A preoperative scanning, immediate postoperative, 2 months postoperative and 8 months postoperative scanning will be done. Tool to be used: 3shape trios 4 what will be assessed: * gingival recession * loss of interdental papillae height Data will be measured in millimeters |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Bone Regeneration | 8 months | measuring the thickness of the labial plate of bone. It will be measured preoperatively, immediate postoperative to measure the amount of the augmented bone, 2 months postoperatively and 8 months post operative. Tool to be used: cone beam computed tomography (cbct) |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pink Esthetic Score (PES) | 8 months | The PES is based on seven variables: mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft tissue color and soft tissue texture. Each variable will be assessed with a 2-1-0 score, with 2 being the best and 0 being the poorest score. |
Countries
Egypt