Skip to content

Effects of Recursive Self-feedback on Speech Production in Aphasia

Recursive Self-feedback Procedures for Improving Spontaneous Speech Production in Patients With Chronic Aphasia

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06323629
Enrollment
45
Registered
2024-03-21
Start date
2024-08-29
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aphasia, Stroke

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effects of recursive self-feedback procedures on spontaneous speech production in stroke survivors with impaired speech production (aphasia). The main question it aims to answer is: • To what extent can stroke survivors with aphasia use their self-feedback alone to improve their spontaneous speech production? Participants will be engaged in the following activities: * They will perform language and cognitive tasks. * Afterwards, they will receive treatments using tablets and headphones at no cost to them. * The experimental treatments (recursive self-feedback procedures) entails responding to prompts, listening to playbacks of their speech response and attempt to minimize/correct the errors in the next attempt. This process will be repeated multiple times per prompt. * The experimental treatments are two: an adaptive version that adapts the complexity of the treatment prompt and a non-adaptive version that does not adapt task complexity. * Researchers will compare the experimental treatments to see if both have similar effects on improving spontaneous speech production.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAdaptive recursive self-feedback procedure

The intervention uses self-feedback alone to improve speech production. It adapts the complexity of the treatment tasks.

BEHAVIORALNon-adaptive recursive self-feedback procedure

The intervention uses self-feedback alone to improve speech production. However, it does not adapt the complexity of the treatment tasks.

Sponsors

University of South Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER
Center for Smart Use of Technologies to Assess Real-world Outcomes
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 6 months post left hemisphere stroke * Aphasia due to left hemisphere stroke * Dominant English speaker

Exclusion criteria

* Speech-language deficits due to neurological insults such as Parkinson's disease, neurodegenerative conditions etc. * Uncorrected sensory impairments. * Language comprehension impairment. * Severe cognitive impairment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Speaking rateWithin 1 week before treatment and within 1 week after treatment.Correct words produced per minute
Speech initiation latency in millisecondsWithin 1 week before treatment and within 1 week after treatment.Latency before retrieving the first correct word in an utterance.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTGerald C. Imaezue, PhD
gimaezue@usf.com(813)974-2464
CONTACTWilliam Burgin, MD
wburgin@usf.edu813-259-8577
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGerald C. Imaezue, PhD

University of South Florida

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026