A Comparative Study Between Three Different Plating Techniques in Management of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures.

A Comparative Study Between Three Different Plating Techniques in Management of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures. A Retrospective Study

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06323122

Enrollment

Registered

2024-03-21

Start date

2021-01-01

Completion date

2023-12-01

Last updated

2024-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mandibular Fractures

Keywords

parasymphyseal, mandibular fracture, internal fixation, miniplates, 3D miniplate

Brief summary

The main goal in management of mandibular fractures is to restore the pre-injury form and function, with the least disability and shortest recovery period.

Detailed description

Currently there are a diversity of metallic hardware used for fixation of jaw fractures. However, the proper selection of the suitable technique is still a matter of debate. The aim of the current study was to compare between the effect of two miniplates, 2.3 high profile Miniplates and three dimensional (3D) Miniplates for internal fixation treatment of mandibular para-symphyseal fractures.

Interventions

DEVICE2.0 miniplates

2.0 miniplates

DEVICE2.3 high profile miniplates

2.3 high profile miniplates

DEVICE3D miniplates

3D miniplates

Study design

Observational model

COHORT

Time perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 60 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with symphyseal/ parasymphyseal mandibular fracture. 2. Patients presenting within 7 days of trauma.

Exclusion criteria

1. Associated fractures that could affect occlusion or dimensions 2. Medically compromised patients who are unfit for management under General Anesthesia 3. Patients with gross infection at the site of fracture 4. Patients not willing to return for follow-up 5. Patients with associated bone pathology

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Surgery Time	intraoperative	measure the time of surgery from incision till closure with minutes

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
complication	6 months	record the surgical complication operative and postoperative
fracture stability	6 months	measure fracture stability from radiographs

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026