Skip to content

Prospective Multicenter Randomized and Controlled Study Evaluating the Benefit of Early Pulmonary Vein Isolation Compared to Usual Treatment in Patients Aged Over 75 Years and Presenting With Atrial Fibrillation

Prospective Multicenter Randomized and Controlled Study Evaluating the Benefit of Early Pulmonary Vein Isolation Compared to Usual Treatment in Patients Aged Over 75 Years and Presenting With Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06322017
Acronym
EDearly AF
Enrollment
294
Registered
2024-03-20
Start date
2024-04-09
Completion date
2030-04-09
Last updated
2025-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation, Pulmonary vein isolation, Elderly Conventional management, Frailty

Brief summary

Therapeutic management of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is based either on heart rate control or on rhythm control, a strategy which aims to maintain a normal heart rhythm. The benefit in terms of morbidity and mortality of a normal heart rhythm would, however, be largely offset by the frequent side effects of antiarrhythmic drugs which could even lead to an increase in mortality compared to rate control. This increase has particularly been suggested in people aged over 75. Since the emergence of catheter Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI), an effective alternative to antiarrhythmic drugs has become available. This technique makes it possible to isolate the foci triggering AF under local or general anesthesia with greater effectiveness than medications and very low risks. Records in the elderly do not seem to show a reduction in effectiveness or an increase in complications. However, in the absence of a dedicated randomized study, its use is strongly limited in the elderly where rate control (52% of people over 65 years old) and the use of antiarrhythmic drugs are largely favored due to the simplicity of implementation and the low cost of medications. However, an early rhythm control strategy seems to reduce cardiovascular events in relatively old individuals (average age 70 years). The use of PVI in first line could make it possible to further improve these results. The objective of the investigator is therefore to carry out the first randomized comparative study proposing to evaluate the impact of early PVI compared to usual treatment in patients aged 75 and over with AF.

Interventions

PROCEDURERhythm control by Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) procedure

The PVI procedure involves the creation of a circumferential lesion around the ostium of the four pulmonary veins. The choice of the type of energy to insure the lesion will be left to the discretion of the investigator, according to the center's habits and the patient's anatomy found on the scanner.

DRUGConventional care by antiarrhythmic drugs (flecainide, sotalol, amiodarone) or bradycardic drugs (all betablocker or calcium channel blocker therapy, digoxin)

Ventricular rate control is carried out using negative chronotropic agents (e.g. beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, digitalis, etc.) according to current recommendations. If this fails, ablation of the atrioventricular junction with placement of a permanent pacemaker can be carried out according to current recommendations. As part of this research, the choice of bradycardic drugs and interventions will be left to the discretion of the investigator according to the center's practices and current recommendations. Rhythm control aims to reduce AF by cardioversion (if it persists) to restore sinus rhythm and subsequently maintain it by introducing anti-arrhythmic treatment. Several antiarrhythmic drugs (flecainide, sotalol or amiodarone) can be used in this setting. As part of this research, the choice of antiarrhythmic drugs will be left to the discretion of the investigator according to the center's practices and current recommendations.

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
75 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Man or woman aged 75 and over. * Paroxysmal AF or early recurrent or persistent paroxysmal AF first diagnosed less than 12 months ago. * Patient who consented to participate in the study. * Patient affiliated to a social security system.

Exclusion criteria

* Indication of cardiac pacing or defibrillation at baseline. * History of valve replacement, atrial occlusion or exclusion. * History of AF ablation. * Contraindication to anticoagulation or an invasive procedure. * Significant heart disease (structural with alteration of LVEF \<35%, congenital heart disease, hypertrophic heart disease with wall of more than 15 mm, revascularized coronary syndrome less than 3 months old). * Stroke less than 6 months old. * Uncontrolled dysthyroidism. * Chronic renal failure (CKD - eGFR \<30 µMol/L). * Patient under curatorship, guardianship, safeguard of justice. * Life expectancy less than 24 months. * Participation in another therapeutic trial likely to impact the study evaluation criteria. * Severe cognitive impairment noted in history. * Lack of understanding of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time before occurrence of the first event among cardiovascular death, hospitalization (all causes) and stroke2 yearsDays

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life scoreInclusionEQ-5D-5L score
Number of documented episodes of AF2 years
Number of patients treated by cardiovascular drugs2 years
Doses of cardiovascular drugs2 yearsmilligrams
Autonomy scoreInclusionActivities of Daily Living (ADL) score
Body weightInclusionkilograms
Number of complications2 years
Number of PVI peri-procedural complications48 hours
Physical performance scoreInclusionShort Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) test score
Evolution of ADL score according to the results of the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) test at inclusion2 years
Evolution of IADL score according to the results of the ICOPE test at inclusion2 years
Cognitive assessmentInclusionMini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score
Numbers of fallsInclusion

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactJean-Baptiste Gourraud, MD
JeanBaptiste.GOURRAUD@chu-nantes.fr0240165143

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026