Skip to content

Comparison of Accuracy and Functional Outcome Between Robotic and Gyroscopic Assisted Surgery in Primary TKA

A Comparison of Accuracy and Functional Outcome Between Robotic Assisted Surgery and Gyroscopic Based Instrument in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06321952
Enrollment
64
Registered
2024-03-20
Start date
2021-09-17
Completion date
2024-02-01
Last updated
2024-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Arthropathy

Brief summary

A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 72 participants who had moderate knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2-3). The patients were randomly assigned to either the robotic-assisted or gyroscopic-assisted group. Baseline characteristics, including age, body mass index, length of stay, and estimated blood loss, were recorded. The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of the hip knee angle, measured by scannogram film preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included functional outcomes (KOOS, Oxford knee score, EQ-5D-5L, range of motion) assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months, as well as at 6 months postoperatively.

Detailed description

Introduction: Primary total knee arthroplasty is considered the gold standard treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee. The primary objective of this surgical procedure is to restore mechanical alignment. At Siriraj Hospital, we employ technology to enhance the accuracy of our surgical procedures. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of robotic-assisted surgery (ROSA) and gyroscope-based surgery in primary total knee arthroplasty. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 72 participants who had moderate knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2-3). The patients were randomly assigned to either the robotic-assisted or gyroscopic-assisted group. Baseline characteristics, including age, body mass index, length of stay, and estimated blood loss, were recorded. The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of the hip knee angle, measured by scannogram film preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included functional outcomes (KOOS, Oxford knee score, EQ-5D-5L, range of motion) assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months, as well as at 6 months postoperatively.

Interventions

DEVICEROSA robotic assist TKA

total knee replacement with ROSA robotic assist

PROCEDUREiassist TKA

total knee replacement with iassist

Sponsors

Mahidol University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* primary osteoarthritis knee with indicated for total knee replacement * age equal or more than 55 years old

Exclusion criteria

* revision surgery * deformity greater than 15º * Intra/Post operative complication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
accuracy of Robotic Assisted Surgery and Gyroscopic Based Instrumentpreoperative and postoperative 3monthsaccuracy of the hip knee angle, measured by scannogram film preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Outcome of Robotic Assisted Surgery and Gyroscopic Based Instrumentpreoperative and postoperative 3months and 6monthsfunctional outcomes (KOOS score) score 0-100 in each domain of 4 domains 0=worst, 100=good

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026