Skip to content

The Additive Value of Pyridostigmine to Silodosin in Acute Urinary Retention

The Additive Value of Pyridostigmine to Silodosin in the Management of Acute Urinary Retention Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06319469
Enrollment
140
Registered
2024-03-20
Start date
2023-02-01
Completion date
2024-01-30
Last updated
2024-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Hyperplasia

Brief summary

Acute urine retention, AUR, is often considered the most serious consequence of aging men with progressive benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). AUR is defined as the sudden and painful inability to void freely. This study aims to evaluate whether pyridostigmine bromide added to silodosin is beneficial in treating acute urine retention caused by BPH.

Detailed description

AUR, or acute urine retention, is often considered the most serious consequence of aging men with progressive benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). AUR is defined as the sudden and painful inability to void freely. (Hartung, 2001). Between 0.4 and 25% of males seen in routine urological care are reported to have AUR each year (Schulman, 2001). According to a significant US cohort study, if a 60-year-old man survived for another 20 years, his probability of experiencing an AUR episode would be 23% (Jacobsen et al., 1997). The current standard of care for AUR typically involves immediate bladder catheterization, followed by subsequent removal of the catheter to test whether normal voiding returns, that is, a trial without a catheter (TWOC) (Gwon et al., 2023).

Interventions

DRUGsilodosin 8 mg capsule and the pyridostigmine bromide 60 mg tablet

The participants were assigned to groups A and B. Group B received the 8 mg silodosin capsule. In contrast, Group A was administered the silodosin 8 mg capsule and the pyridostigmine bromide 60 mg tablet. Over a week, each group administered their designated drug once per day

DRUGsilodosin 8 mg capsule

The participants were assigned to groups A and B. Group B received the 8 mg silodosin capsule. In contrast, Group A was administered the silodosin 8 mg capsule and the pyridostigmine bromide 60 mg tablet. Over a week, each group administered their designated drug once per day

Sponsors

Beni-Suef University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a retention volume of less than 1000 milliliters who were over 50 years old and going through their first episode of acute urine retention (AUR) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were included in this study

Exclusion criteria

* The individuals who do not meet the eligibility requirements are those who have been diagnosed with an infection of the urinary tract, have repeatedly retained urine, have had unsuccessful trial voiding procedures in the past, have a retention volume of more than one liter, have had a history of prostatic or bladder neck surgery, have been diagnosed with prostate carcinoma, have experienced urethral stricture, have a neurogenic bladder, have been diagnosed with renal failure, or have been diagnosed with liver disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)3 MONTHSt is a validated, reproducible scoring system to assess disease severity and response to therapy. The IPSS is made up of 7 questions related to voiding symptoms. A score of 0 to 7 indicates mild symptoms, 8 to 19 indicates moderate symptoms and 20 to 35 indicates severe symptoms.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026