Skip to content

Nadroparin Versus TIPS in Cirrhotic Patients With Refractory Asymptomatic PVT

Comparative Effectiveness of Nadroparin Versus Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in Cirrhotic Patients With Refractory Asymptomatic Portal Vein Thrombosis:a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06319131
Enrollment
84
Registered
2024-03-19
Start date
2024-05-01
Completion date
2026-05-30
Last updated
2024-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Portal Vein Thrombosis

Keywords

portal vein thrombosis, liver cirrhosis, nadroparin, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of nadroparin versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhotic patients with refractory asymptomatic portal vein thrombosis using a design of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial

Detailed description

This research project aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) associated with liver cirrhosis. Building upon this, a randomized controlled study will be carried out for PVT patients with poor response to anticoagulant treatment. The study will compare the effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and prolonged anticoagulant therapy. The ultimate goal is to provide high-quality clinical research evidence for interventional treatment of liver cirrhosis-associated PVT. This comprehensive approach aims to provide evidence-based medical guidance for optimizing the treatment pathway for refractory PVT in liver cirrhosis.

Interventions

PROCEDURETIPS

Using the transjugular approach, TIPS was created under local anesthesia. The first branch of the left or right portal vein (PV) was punctured by RUPS-100 set guided by digital subtraction angiography. After successful access into PV, direct portography was performed and all visible varices and/or concurrent spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) were embolized with coils and n-butyl cyanoacrylate. A polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent (Viatorr Endoprosthesis, GORE and Associates, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA) with a diameter of 8 mm was implanted and fully dilated.

Nadroparin calcium will be subcutaneously injected with the dose of 85IU/kg q12h

Sponsors

Shanghai 6th People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
ShuGuang Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Tongji Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
CollaboratorOTHER
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with liver cirrhosis * Diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis through computed tomographic venography with a thrombus diameter exceeding 30% of the vessel diameter. * Consent to participate in the clinical trial and the signing of an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of acute symptoms such as fever, abdominal pain or bleeding, or of cavernous transformation * Patients with Child-Pugh C. * Pregnant or lactating women. * With a history of liver cancer or other malignancy. * Severe heart, lung diseases, or significant renal dysfunction. * Allergies to anticoagulant medications, uncontrolled hypertension, history of cerebral hemorrhage, discovery of gastrointestinal ulcers, ulcerative colitis, subacute bacterial endocarditis, or other contraindications to anticoagulant drugs. * On concomitant therapy of immunosuppressive drugs. * With coagulation disorders other than liver disease. * With active variceal bleeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
complete recanalization rate of PVT6 monthsEnhanced abdominal CT scan will be performed to assess the recanalization of PVT. The primary outcome is the complete recanalization.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
partial recanalization rate of PVT6 monthsEnhanced abdominal CT scan will be performed to assess the recanalization of PVT. Partial recanalization is defined as decrease of PVT more than 50%.
Bleeding rate6 monthsBleeding events related to anticoagulant therapy. Bleeding events will be further classified into major and minor according to the established criteria outlined by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Mortality6 monthsSurvival analysis

Contacts

Primary ContactJie CHEN, MD
chen.jie5@zs-hospital.sh.cn8613764633539
Backup ContactLili Liu, MD
liu.lili@zs-hospital.sh.cn862164041990-612632

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026