Skip to content

Outcomes of Different Treatment Options in Chronic Venous Disease

An Observational, Prospective Study to Assess the Outcomes of Different Treatment Options in Patients With Chronic Venous Disease in Belgium

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06318988
Acronym
VOS
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2024-03-19
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
2027-05-01
Last updated
2024-06-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Venous Disease

Brief summary

This study aims to describe conservative and invasive treatments for patients with chronic venous disease (CVD) in Belgium, and their association with clinical and patient-reported outcomes during a follow-up of 24 months.

Detailed description

This study is an observational, prospective, multicentre study to assess the effectiveness of conservative and invasive treatments in patients with CVD in Belgium. The inclusion period of the study will last 6 months. Patients will be followed until 2 years after inclusion into the study. During the inclusion period, after confirmation of eligibility, patients with CVD diagnosed by the General Practitioner (GP) and requiring a treatment will be invited to participate in the study. About 140 GPs across Belgium will be included in the study. During the first visit, a treatment strategy will be proposed to the patient by the GP. The treatment can be conservative or invasive, depending on the severity of the disease. Patients awaiting invasive treatment may receive conservative treatment to alleviate symptoms. The choice of treatment modality is left to the discretion of the treating physician, in agreement with the patient and according to local policies. As this is an observational study, there will be no interference in the choice of treatment, and no restrictions will be imposed.

Interventions

PROCEDURERadiofrequency ablation using Closure fast

Thermal ablation technique

sclero-or foamsclerose

DRUGDaflon

Venoactive drugs

Compression

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\* Patient visiting a GP with complaints related to CVD, * Patient receiving the diagnosis of CVD from the GP during the V0, according to international guidelines and made on a clinical basis, * Patient requiring and agreeing to receive conservative or invasive treatment, * French or Dutch speaking patient, * Patient signed informed consent and agrees to take part in the study and follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient with coagulation disorders such as thrombophilia and/or taking anticoagulation drugs, * Pregnant or breastfeeding patient, * Patient with severe Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease (POAD), with Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) \< 0.8, * Patient with malignancy, * Patient with neurological disorder or dementia, * Patients taking regular treatment for CVD 3 months prior to inclusion (except painkillers or anti-inflammatory drugs if taken for reasons other than CVD), * Patient in any other clinical study for any pharmaceutical product within 4 weeks preceding study inclusion, * Patient with any comorbidity or situation preventing a follow-up of 2 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Chronic Venous Insufficiency QOL questionnaire- 20 (CIVIQ-20) scorebaseline to 12 weeksChronic Venous Insufficiency QOL questionnaire-20 score, min 20 max 100, higher means worse outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change in the Chronic Venous Insufficiency QOL questionnaire-20 score (CIVIQ-20)through study completion, an average of 2 yearsThe change in the CIVIQ-20 over time; min 20 max 100, higher means worse outcome
The change in the clinical part of the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical and Pathophysiological classification (CEAP classification)through study completion, an average of 2 yearsThe change in the clinical part of the CEAP classification over time, min C0, max C6, higher means worse outcome
The change in the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS)through study completion, an average of 2 yearsThe change in the rVCSS over time; min 0 max 30, higher means worse outcome
Intervention as secondary/add-on treatmentmonth 24Proportion of patients who received an intervention as secondary/add-on treatment to conservative treatment
The change in satisfaction scorethrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsThe change in satisfaction score over time, min 0, max 10; higher means better outcome
Adverse Events (AEs).month 24Number and proportion of patients with Adverse Events (AEs).
The change in the symptoms, recorded with a questionnairethrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsThe change in the symptomatology over time, recorded with a questionnaire

Contacts

Primary ContactSarah THOMIS, PhD
sarah.thomis@uzleuven.be+32498296629

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026