Skip to content

The Efficacy of Online Exergaming-Integrated Physiotherapy for Parkinson's Disease

Assessing the Efficacy of Online Exergaming-Integrated Physiotherapy for Parkinson's Disease: A Validation Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06317792
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-03-19
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2024-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinsonism in Diseases Classified Elsewhere

Keywords

online exergaming-based physiotherapy, Parkinson's disease

Brief summary

To validate the efficiency of online exergaming-based physiotherapy. We will enroll patients with Parkinson's disease in postural instability and gait disturbance motor phenotype in the study and divide them into two groups in a randomized controlled study.

Detailed description

The investigators will enroll patients in PIGD and divide them into two groups in a randomized controlled study. Participants received an exergaming intervention using the Kinect sensor (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) from a commercially available exercise system (HappyGoGo, LONGGOOD MEDITECH LTD., Taipei, Taiwan). The Kinect sensor incorporates infrared light and a video camera, which creates a 3D map of the area in front of it. This device provides full-body 3D motion capture. The online exergaming-based physiotherapy programs focus on training in shoulder, hip, and knee ROM balance, weight-bearing, strength, weight shifting, and walking based on RF in machine learning to the features selection in patients with PIGD. The training tasks consist of 10 pieces of training (20 minutes per session, five sessions every week, for 8 weeks). Five exergaming programs were used for training, designed to incorporate an appropriate level of challenge to match the ability and fitness of patients with PD. To confirm the status of individual training at home, the data will be sent back to the computer output report of the medical side after each training is completed. These data include the quantitative data of a joint ROM, the movement cycle change diagram, and the upper and low limb movements decomposed by each movement plane. The investigators also obtain the trajectory path mapping to understand whether the quality of individual actions is accurate, in place, and line with expected benchmarks. Safety and Tolerability: If the patient can not complete half of the rehabilitation program, this/her data will be excluded from the analysis. Exergame rehabilitation outcome assessments To evaluate the efficiency and the durability of the training effect. Outcomes were measured at five different periods including Month 0 (pretest) (clinical score, gait cycle, cognitive function, and fMRI), Month 2 (posttest) (clinical score, gait cycle, and fMRI), and Month 8 (follow-up) (clinical score, gait cycle, and cognitive function) and Year 2 and year 3 (follow-up) (clinical score, gait cycle, and cognitive function). 1. Functional Outcome Measure: Clinical scores and parameters of walking gait cycle The Functional Outcome measure includes the (1) UPDRS score, (2) Tinetti balance and gait score, (3) Berg Balance Scale, (4) Time-up to go test, and (5) parameters in the gait cycle including plantar pressure measurement, static and dynamic balance measures, COP trajectory measurements during gait initiation, and spatiotemporal and kinematic gait analysis in straightforward walking and turning through study completion, an average of three years. 2. Secondary outcome measures include Severity, frequency, and situations of falling and Physical (balance, mobility, freezing of gait, habitual physical activity) and psychological (fear of falling, affect) measures during the intervention and through study completion, an average of three years.

Interventions

OTHERonline exergaming-based physiotherapy programs

The online exergaming-based physiotherapy programs focus on training in shoulder, hip, and knee ROM balance, weight-bearing, strength, weight shifting, and walking based on RF in machine learning to the features selection in patients with PIGD. The training tasks consist of a set of 10 pieces of training (20 min per session, five sessions every week, for 8 weeks). Five exergaming programs were used for training, designed to incorporate an appropriate level of challenge to match the ability and fitness of patients with PD.

Sponsors

National Science and Technology Council
CollaboratorFED
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Participants will be divided into two groups in a randomized controlled study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease

Exclusion criteria

1. Moderate and severe dementia (Clinical Dementia Rating more than or equal to 2) 2. Advanced PD stage (Hoehn and Yahr staging equal or more than four)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score assessmentIntervention and follow-up period through study completion, an average of 3 yearsThe outcome measure is the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score. The UPDRS scale consists of the following six segments: 1) Mentation, Behavior, and Mood, 2) ADL, 3) Motor sections, and 4) Complications of Therapy (in the past week) The four segments are made up of 42 items grouped into four subscales. Each item has 0-4 ratings: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), and 4 (severe)
Tinetti balance and gait score assessmentIntervention and follow-up period through study completion, an average of 3 yearsThe score consists of two parts, including the balance score (score=0-16) and gait score (score=0-12), and ranged from 0 to 28 points by summing the points obtained for each of the two tests.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fall Risk assessment using Berg Balance Scaleintervention and follow-up period through study completion, an average of 3 yearsThe maximum obtainable Berg Balance Scale is 56 and there are four ranges of scores. Patients scoring range of 41-56, 21-40, and 0 -20 indicate low fall risk, medium fall risk, and high fall risk, respectively
Depression severity assessmentintervention and follow-up period through study completion, an average of 3 yearsTo obtain a patient-based measurement of depression, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-30) was used. Depression severity was classified using the GDS-30 as follows: No depression (GDS 0-9), mild depression (GDS 10-19), and severe depression (GDS 20-30).

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactCheng-Hsien Lu, MD
chlu99@adm.cgmh.org.tw+886975056603

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026