Skip to content

Outcomes Comparison Between Bone Resection and Subperiosteal Dissection for Specific Type of Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Does Composite Bone Resection for Soft Tissue Sarcoma With Cortical Contact Result in Better Local Control and Survival Compared to Sub-periosteal Dissection?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06317480
Enrollment
142
Registered
2024-03-19
Start date
2000-05-01
Completion date
2023-09-01
Last updated
2024-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cortical Contact, Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Brief summary

the purpose of this study is to assess whether bone resection for thigh soft tissue sarcoma with cortical involvement of the adjacent bone result in better local control and survival compared to sub-periosteal dissection. Investigators also aim to find out the prognostic factors for clinical outcomes in this group of patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREbone resection

patients underwent soft tissue sarcoma excision together with bone resection following either biological or endoprosthesis reconstruction

PROCEDUREsubperiosteal excision

patients underwent sub-periosteal tumor excision combining bone and soft tissue ablation without bone excision

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients developed thigh soft tissue sarcoma, defined as lesion located below the plane of the lesser trochanter and above the plane of the femoral condyle. 2. received primary limb-salvage surgery at our center. 3. soft tissue sarcoma with only cortical contact of the adjacent bone based on preoperative imaging 4. minimum of 2-year follow up

Exclusion criteria

1. diagnosis was well differentiated liposarcoma 2. patients with metastatic disease at the time of presentation 3. soft tissue sarcoma displayed frank osseous invasion (eg. medullary canal invasion)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
survivalpatients were checked every three months for the initial two years after surgery and every 6 months for the subsequent three years. After 5 years, patients will be checked once every year until patients died or were loss to follow up.Whether patient die or not
recurrencepatients were checked every three months for the initial two years after surgery and every 6 months for the subsequent three years. After 5 years, patients will be checked once every year until patients died or were oss to follow up.whether patients developed local recurrence
metastasispatients were checked every three months for the initial two years after surgery and every 6 months for the subsequent three years. After 5 years, patients will be checked once every year until they died or were loss to follow up.whether patients developed metastasis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
functional outcomesMSTS scores were measured every 6 months for the first two years after surgery. After that, MSTS outcomes were measured once every year until patients died or were loss to follow up.The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) questionnaire for the lower extremity is composed of six items including pain, function, emotional acceptance, use of any external support, walking ability, and gait alteration. Each item is rated in a scale of 0-5. The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better function.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026