Skip to content

Oral Photographs of Patients on Oral Hygiene Motivation

Use of Oral Photographs of Patients on Oral Hygiene Motivation Promotes Periodontal Health: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06316505
Enrollment
56
Registered
2024-03-18
Start date
2023-12-01
Completion date
2024-03-01
Last updated
2024-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hygiene, Motivation, Periodontal Diseases

Keywords

oral hygiene, periodontal health, periodontal indices, motivation, Modified Bass Technique

Brief summary

Based on these considerations, this randomized controlled trial aimed to determine the effectiveness of a personalized visual oral health education program in addition to conventional education on oral hygiene by comparing changes in clinical periodontal parameters. Participants will get conventional oral hygiene education (COHE) with/without visual motivation using self oral photographs of patients. Researchers will compare Intervention group and control groups on oral hygiene by comparing changes in clinical periodontal parameters.

Detailed description

Maintaining oral health requires a motivated patient. The adherence to a lifelong oral hygiene regimen is significantly influenced by an individual's motivation and manual dexterity. The physician's responsibility in this context is to provide guidance to the patient regarding the appropriate and efficient oral hygiene routine, as well as to motivate their adherence to it. The definition of motivation is to stimulate action or effort towards a particular goal or objective. Motivation is a condition that can be altered in response to external influences and time, rather than being a characteristic. The primary objective of motivation is to enhance persons' knowledge of this matter by highlighting oral health, introducing oral hygiene, and offering information on efficacious mechanical cleaning procedures for eliminating factors that contribute to the deterioration of oral hygiene. Participants were divided into 2 groups using https://www.randomizer.org/ website: Control group (CG) (n=28): Conventional oral hygiene education (COHE) \[22\] Intervention group (IG) (n=28): In addition to COHE, the following steps were followed: * Session 1: A photograph was taken before (F1) and after (F2) full-mouth scaling root planing (fmSRP). Then the patient was shown the difference. * 2nd session: A photograph was taken (F3) and the patient is shown the difference between F1 and F3. * 3rd session: A photograph was taken (F4) and the patient is shown the difference between F1 - F3 - F4.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALOral hygiene motivation with individual oral photograps

Oral photograps was taken at control sessions.

Sponsors

Didem OZKAL EMINOGLU
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* age ranging from 18-60 years; * a minimum of 12 teeth; * and being available for the follow-up assessment * participants were wanted to be right-handers when toothbrushing to standardization.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with systemic illnesses or conditions, * smokers and individuals taking any medication that may affect periodontal health were not included in the study. * Individuals who had previously been treated for periodontal disease in the past 6 months were also excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical periodontal parameters / plaque index (PI)T0: baseline, T1: 1 month after baseline, T2: 3 months after baselineThe amount of plaque present on the teeth was assessed using a plaque staining agent and graded according to the plaque index system. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Clinical periodontal parameters / gingival index (GI)T0: baseline, T1: 1 month after baseline, T2: 3 months after baselineThe presence and extent of gingival inflammation and bleeding were graded according to the gingival index system. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Clinical periodontal parameters / probing pocket depth (PPD).T0: baseline, T1: 1 month after baseline, T2: 3 months after baselinePPD was measured as the distance between the deepest point of the sulcus and the gingival margin. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Clinical periodontal parameters / bleeding on probing (BOP)T0: baseline, T1: 1 month after baseline, T2: 3 months after baselineThe presence of bleeding on probing is considered an objective sign of periodontal inflammation. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026