Skip to content

Diagnostic Value of Recto-perineal Ultrasound in Perianal Fistula

Diagnostic Value of Recto-perineal Ultrasound in Perianal Fistula; Pre Versus Intraoperative Findings: a Comparative Cross Section Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06314945
Enrollment
93
Registered
2024-03-18
Start date
2023-09-01
Completion date
2024-03-01
Last updated
2024-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perianal Fistula

Keywords

recto-perineal ultrasound, perianal fistula, trans-sphincteric

Brief summary

Perianal fistula is a common anal problem. It needs only surgery. MRI is the best preoperative diagnostic tool, but it is demanding as it is expensive, time consuming and needs an experienced radiologist. So, we tried to find an alternative diagnostic tool which is cheaper, time saving and accurate and comparing its preoperative reports with intraoperative findings. study was held in surgery department in Zagazig University Hospitals from September 2023 to March 2024. It included 93 patients with perianal fistula who were diagnosed clinically and radiological by trans recto-perineal ultrasound and comparing pre-operative ultrasound findings with intra-operative surgical findings.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Zagazig University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Perianal abscess and\\or fistula * Patients who accidently discovered during transvaginal ultrasound. * Age group between above 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

* Informed consent refusal. * Proved anal malignancy. * Patients less than 18 years old

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
abscess cavityfrom 2 to 3 days pre-operative and intraoperativelypresence or absence of abscess cavity was assessed in ultrasound and intraoperative
Internal openingfrom 2 to 3 days pre-operative and intraoperativelypresence and site of internal opening was assessed by digital rectal examination and utrasound
fistula branchesfrom 2 to 3 days pre-operative and intraoperativelypresence of fistula branches and their number were assessed by ultrasound and during surgery
type fistulous tractfrom 2 to 3 days pre-operative and intraoperativelytype of fistula was detected in relation to anal sphincters by ultrasound and intraoperative
agefrom 2 to 3 days before operationage of patient was recorded in years
sexfrom 2 to 3 days before surgerysex of patients was recorded as male or female
body mass indexfrom 2 to 3 days before surgerypatient BMI was recorded by dividing weight in kg by length square in meters
history of abscess drainagefrom 2 to 3 days before surgeryhistory of perianal abscess was recorded

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
external openingsfrom 2 to 3 days pre-operative and intraoperativelynumber and site of external openings was assessed by clinical and radiological examination
anal dischargefrom 2 to 3 days before surgerypresence or absence of anal discharge, its color, odor and viscosity were assessed by history of soiling underwear and clinical examination by soiling of gloves or direct vision of discharge during digital rectal examination
other anal diseasefrom 2 to 3 days before surgerypresence or absence of other anal disease like anal fissure, piles or inflammatory bowel disease from medical records of the patients

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026