Skip to content

Comparing Artificial Intelligence and Standard Ultrasound Methods for Estimating Fetal Weight in Pregnancy. Patients Eligible for Inclusion Are Women With a Gestational Age Between 24-42 Weeks Undergoing a Growth Scan. The Image Data From the Scan Are Used to Calculate Fetal Weight.

A Prospective Silent Trial of Artificial Intelligence for Fetal Weight Estimation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06314178
Enrollment
283
Registered
2024-03-15
Start date
2024-07-01
Completion date
2025-12-30
Last updated
2026-06-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy Complications

Brief summary

The primary aim of this observational study is to compare the accuracy of two artificial intelligence (AI) models with the traditional Hadlock formula for estimating fetal weight from ultrasound scans performed in pregnant women between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation. The secondary aim is to investigate potential demographic bias in the AI models. The demographic factors examined include body mass index (BMI), parity, gestational age, maternal age, fetal sex, and the presence of preeclampsia. Participants' ultrasound scans will be pseudonymized and securely stored on password-protected removable drives to ensure the protection of their identity and privacy. The ultrasound data will subsequently be transferred to the Technical University of Denmark (DTU), where the AI models will analyze the images to estimate fetal weight.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women with gestational age between 24-42 weeks undergoing a third-trimester growth scan.

Exclusion criteria

* Women with multiple pregnancies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing the accuracy of the Hadlock formula and the AI modelFrom enrollment to the birth of the childThe primary objective is to compare the accuracy of fetal weight estimation between the Hadlock formula and two deep learning models in clinical practice

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Demographic biasesFrom enrollment to the birth of the childThe secondary objective is to investigate whether the deep learning models show any demographic biases when estimating fetal growth in clinical practice. This is assessed by comparing the accuracy of the Hadlock formula and the deep learning models against the fetal weight at the time of the scan, which is estimated from the birth weight using the Marsal growth curve.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 13, 2026