Self Harm, Suicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempt
Conditions
Keywords
Suicide, Self-Harm, Attempt, Ideation, Suicidal thought, Suicidal plan, Crisis intervention, Suicide prevention, Emotional support, Mental Health, Behavioral Health, Psychiatry, Emergency Department, Technology, Mobile Application, Implementation, Safety Plan, Lethal Means
Brief summary
This Study will evaluate the implementation of a multi-component suicide prevention technology (Jaspr Health) that facilitates delivery of suicided-related evidence-based practices (EBPs) while replacing wasted waiting time with productive time in the Emergency Departments (EDs). The EBPs satisfy several key performance elements for systems adopting Zero Suicide. A Complementary Randomized Controlled Trial and Real-World Study for Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Implementation Study Design (CREID) will be used
Detailed description
This study will evaluate Jaspr's patient-facing tablet-based application (app) during suicide-related ED visits. The app guides patients in completing the Suicide Status Interview, which comprises of evidence-based CAMS certified suicide prevention tools such as a suicide risk assessment, Stanley Brown- inspired safety plan, and lethal means safety counseling. It also offers access to a menu of Comfort and Skills modules that teaches patients behavioral skills to effectively manage imminent distress, while shared stories offer a library of professionally produced, racially and culturally diverse, inspirational videos of people with suicide-centered lived experience. Subjects who engage with Jaspr can continue to access their safety plan, comfort and coping skills exercises, and the video library via Jaspr at Home (JAH) mobile application; a summary of the self-administered risk assessment is shared with the clinical team directly through the patient electronic health record to help guide the treatment plan. Part A of the study will be a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of action of Jaspr's app intervention in EDs. It is reported in a separate CTG protocol (Unique Protocol ID: STUDY00000716 Part A) This CTG protocol describes Part B of the study, which will be a Real-World Study (RWS) to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation processes in EDs and outcomes. Two health systems affiliated with Ohio State University and the University of Colorado will implement Jaspr as part of routine clinical care. Each health system will implement Jaspr in two diverse EDs: one major academic site, and one community site. Each system will collect data on eligible patients across two Phases: (1) a retrospective enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU) phase comprising 12 months of index ED visits with a 12 month follow-up window, and (2) an Implementation/Intervention phase comprising 18 months of index ED visits with a 12 month follow-up window. Eligible patients will be defined as individuals 18 years or older who present to the ED in the designated date ranges and who screen positive for suicide risk on an evidence based screener administered clinically. Data for all eligible patients across both phases will be collected. Data sources will be electronic health records (EHR) and state death registries. Data related to the index ED visit and all acute care visits within a 12 month follow-up window of the index visit will be collected. A limited dataset with personal identifiers removed will be shared with UMass Chan Medical School for harmonization and analyses.
Interventions
Jaspr was designed to improve delivery of evidence-based, personalized suicide care in the ED. Jaspr (Dimeff, R44MH108222) is rooted in EBPs, including Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicide (CAMS) and Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT). Briefly, Jaspr provides a patient interface, optimized for a tablet computer provided to the patient, which uses an avatar to administer: (1) the CAMS Suicide Status Form (SSF), an evidence-based suicide risk assessment; (2) crisis stabilization planning (CAMS' version of safety planning) or Stanley-Brown Safety Planning Intervention, depending on site choice; (3) lethal means safety counseling. Further, Jaspr teaches behavioral skills from DBT to manage imminent distress and has a library of over 40 racially and culturally diverse, inspirational videos of people with lived experience. Finally, Jaspr@home provides access to these resources after the visit during the high-risk transition to outpatient care.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* \>= 18 years old * Positive for suicide risk on screener * Reads English, or has proxy available to read and enter questions
Exclusion criteria
* Cognitively or emotionally incapable of engaging with Jaspr
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Suicide composite, binary | 12 months post enrollment | Death by suicide OR suicide-related acute care utilization within 12 months after enrollment |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient reach | Duration of implementation = 36 months | Percentage of eligible patients who initiated Jaspr by answering at least one question on the Suicide Status Interview (SSI) in Jaspr app |
| Fidelity | Duration of implementation= 36 months | Percentage of patients who started the Suicide Status Interview (SSI) in Jaspr app and who completed the SSI and a safety plan |
| Exposure, Time | Duration of implementation= 36 months | Within patients who started the Suicide Status Interview (SSI) in Jaspr app, total time spent on all components. Measured in minutes |
| Costs | Duration of implementation= 36 months | Costs associated with Jaspr deployment and use. Measured by: U.S. dollar (US$) |
| Clinician acceptability | Duration of implementation= 36 months | Structured measure viewing Jaspr as agreeable, palatable, satisfactory using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Likert type scale, higher scores = stronger clinician acceptability |
| Patient acceptability | Duration of implementation= 36 months | Structured measure viewing Jaspr as agreeable, palatable, satisfactory using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Likert type scale, higher scores = stronger patient acceptability |
| Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) delivery | During index visit = Day 1 | Number of patients receiving evidence based care, including evidence based suicide risk assessment, safety planning, lethal means safety counseling, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) coping skills training, suicide education materials, and behavioral health referral resources. Higher count = more EBPs delivered |
| Usability (clinician) | Duration of implementation= 36 months | Structured measure of clinicians' perception of the usability of Jaspr using the System Usability Scale (SUS) , Likert type scale, higher scores = stronger clinician ratings of usability |
| System workflow impact, door to behavioral health evaluation | Duration of implementation= 36 months | Of patients who meet eligibility criteria for Jaspr, how long in minutes does it take to get a behavioral health evaluation from when they are registered in the ED, continuous, measured in minutes, higher minutes = longer evaluation wait |
| System workflow impact, total length of stay | Duration of implementation= 36 months | Of patients who meet eligibility criteria for Jaspr, how long in minutes does it take for their entire visit from registration to discharge, continuous, measured in minutes, higher minutes = longer total length of stay |
| System workflow impact, 28 day revisit | Duration of implementation= 36 months | Of patients who meet eligibility criteria for Jaspr, how many return to the ED within 28 days, binary, Yes/No |
| System workflow impact, clinician perception | Duration of implementation= 36 months | Clinician perception of workflow impact after Jaspr is implemented, assessed by a structured interview, qualitative descriptions |
| Feasibility of Jaspr in ED | Duration of implementation= 36 months | Clinicians' qualitative review of barriers to implementation |
Countries
United States