Skip to content

A 3-Year Clinical Evaluation Of Endocrown Restorations With Two Different Materials

A 3-Year Clinical Evaluation Of Endocrown Restorations With Two Different Materials Using The Computer-Aided Design/ Computer-Aided Manufacture (Cad/Cam) System

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06311422
Enrollment
74
Registered
2024-03-15
Start date
2020-03-15
Completion date
2028-09-15
Last updated
2024-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endodontically Treated Teeth

Keywords

CAD/CAM, Endocrown, resin nanoceramic, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate

Brief summary

The clinical performance of two different materials in endodontically treated teeth produced with CAD/CAM system will be evaluated and compared. After obtaining a signed informed consert form from all the patients, all restorations will be placed by a single clinician. All endocrown restorations will be produced using the same CAD/CAM system. 52 restorations will be fabricated using Lava Ultimate (LU, 3M Espe, Seefeld, Germany) blocks and 38 restorations will be fabricated using Celtra Duo (CD, Dentsply Sirona, York, PA, USA) blocks. All restorative procedures will be conducted according to manufacturers' instructions. Restorations will be scored using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria after baseline, 6,12,36, 48, 60 months. Descriptive statistics will be performed using Chi-square and Fisher exact test.

Interventions

OTHERresin nanoceramic block

Resin-based CAD/CAM materials

OTHERzirconia-reinforced lithium silicate

zirconia reinforced lithium silicate ceramic

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Good general health * Patients older than 18 * Teeth must receive endodontic therapy before restoration * The periodontal condition had to be stabilized before restoration * No subject complained of discomfort in teeth * Radiograph revealing alveolar bone resorption of less than a third and no shadow around the periapical tissues * Participants who provided writen informed consent were recruited in collaboration

Exclusion criteria

* Any teeth with microcracks or fracture lines * Affected teeth without completed root canal treatment * The defect was less than ¼ of crown or more than ¾ of the crown and the margin of the residual crown was more than 1 mm below the gingival level * Poor oral hygiene and periodontal status which persisted or worsened after periodontal therapy and education * Bruxism or clenching patients * Poor general health or pregnancy * Patients who have read the informed consent form and refused to be included in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical performance of two materials36 months36 months-Modified United States Public Health Service

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026