Skip to content

Prospective Validation Study of High Volume Urine DNA Testing in Individuals With Suspicion of Urothelial Cancer

Observational Prospective Multicenter Validation Study Investigating the Possibility of Replacing Cystoscopies With High Volume Urine DNA Testing in Individuals With Suspicion of Urothelial Cancer (UROSCOUT-1)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06310759
Acronym
UROSCOUT-1
Enrollment
3000
Registered
2024-03-15
Start date
2024-01-08
Completion date
2029-12-31
Last updated
2025-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urothelial Carcinoma

Keywords

Urothelial neoplasms, Bladder neoplasms, Upper tract urothelial neoplasms, Liquid biopsies, Urine tumor DNA

Brief summary

Urothelial cancers of the bladder and upper urinary tract account for over 200,000 deaths and 600,000 diagnoses annually worldwide. The most common presenting symptom is hematuria (blood in urine), triggering a cascade of tests, including an invasive examination of the bladder using a flexible scope (cystoscopy). Millions of cystoscopies are performed every year worldwide for patients presenting with hematuria, but only 10% result in a cancer diagnosis. The UROSCOUT-1 trial is a prospective multicenter observational study that explores the potential of urine tumor DNA (utDNA) testing to replace a significant portion of cystoscopies in the diagnostic setting for hematuria or other reasons to rule out urothelial cancer. The goal is to enhance patient quality of life, reduce healthcare costs, and address increased workloads in urology centers. Sample collection will be conducted by mail, and the samples will be analyzed in a blinded manner, without knowledge of which patients are diagnosed with cancer. Random subsampling will be applied to cancer-negative patients to achieve an approximate 1:1 ratio between cancer-positive and -negative patients.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Tampere University
CollaboratorOTHER
Tampere University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Willing and able to provide informed consent * Patient has been scheduled for cystoscopy to rule out urothelial cancer

Exclusion criteria

* Prior diagnosis of urothelial cancer (i.e. bladder cancer or upper tract urothelial carcinoma)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity and specificity of urine tumor DNA (utDNA) test for urothelial cancer detection1 year after diagnostic workupSensitivity and specificity of utDNA test for urothelial cancer detection, using histologically confirmed cancer diagnoses within 1 year of the diagnostic workup as ground truth

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity and specificity of urine cytology for urothelial cancer detection1 year after diagnostic workupSensitivity and specificity or urine cytology for urothelial cancer detection, using histologically confirmed cancer diagnoses within 1 year of the diagnostic workup as ground truth
Time to diagnosis of urothelial cancer in patients with a positive utDNA test but negative cystoscopy2, 5, and 10 years after diagnostic utDNA testingTime to diagnosis of urothelial cancer in patients with a positive utDNA test but negative cystoscopy
Adverse event rate for cystoscopy4 weeks after cystoscopyAdverse event rate for cystoscopy, based on CTCAE 5.0
Technical success rate of utDNA testImmediately after utDNA sample analysisFraction of all analyzed urine samples for which the analysis met the quality control criteria for a technically successful analysis
Estimate of diagnostic cystoscopies avoided4 weeks after cystoscopyEstimated fraction of diagnostic cystoscopies that could have been avoided by pre-screening patients with a utDNA test (calculated as the fraction of all diagnostic utDNA samples that were negative and for which subsequent cystoscopy did not lead to clinical interventions)
Specificity of high-stringency utDNA threshold1 year after diagnostic workupSpecificity of a high-stringency utDNA threshold (at least 2 known urothelial cancer driver mutations with allele fraction \> 5%) for clinically detectable urothelial cancer
Sensitivity and specificity of cystoscopy for urothelial cancer detection1 year after diagnostic workupSensitivity and specificity of cystoscopy for urothelial cancer detection, using histologically confirmed cancer diagnoses within 1 year of the diagnostic workup as ground truth

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Characteristics of urothelial cancers that were not detected by the utDNA testImmediately after pathological examination of surgical tissueCharacteristics of urothelial cancers that were not detected by the utDNA test (TNM pathological stage, World Health Organization (WHO) 2004/2016 grade, and tumor size)
Concordance between utDNA and urine cytology resultsImmediately after completion of utDNA analysis and urine cytologyConcordance between utDNA and urine cytology results, with respect to positivity of the test

Countries

Canada, Finland, Japan, United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJussi Nikkola, MD PhD
jussi.nikkola@fimnet.fi03311611

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026