Skip to content

Additional Circular Dressing Material

Does Fixing Peripheral Intravenous Catheter With Additional Circular Dressing Material Reduce PIVC Failure And Complications? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06310694
Enrollment
91
Registered
2024-03-15
Start date
2023-04-27
Completion date
2023-12-30
Last updated
2024-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nurse's Role

Keywords

peripheral cannulation, catheter related complications, infusions, intravenous, dressing, nursing

Brief summary

The study was conducted to determine the effect of fixing peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) with additional circular dressing material on the duration of PIVC stay and complications related to peripheral intravenous catheterization. In our study, a comparison was made of PIVCs applied to patients in the control (fixation of PIVC with a sterile transparent dressing) and intervention (fixation of PIVC with a sterile transparent dressing and application of an elastane circular dressing on it) groups in a public hospital in Turkey. All-cause PIVC failure was significantly higher in the intervention group (70.2%) compared to the control group (45.5%). It has been determined that fixing the PIVC with additional circular dressing material prolongs the duration of PIVC stay at the site.

Detailed description

This study was conducted as a randomized controlled study to determine the effect of fixing the peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) with additional circular dressing material on the duration of stay of the peripheral intravenous catheter and complications related to peripheral intravenous catheterization. In our study, a comparison was made of PIVCs applied to patients in the control (fixation of PIVC with a sterile transparent dressing) and intervention (fixation of PIVC with a sterile transparent dressing and application of an elastane circular dressing on it) groups in a public hospital in Turkey. In our study, PIVC failure was defined as PIVC removal before the end of treatment due to phlebitis, infiltration, accidental dislodgement, occlusion, and leakage. A total of 91 (47 intervention, 44 control) participants were included in the study between April 2023 and September 2023. All-cause PIVC failure was significantly higher in the intervention group (70.2%) compared to the control group (45.5%). It was determined that fixing the PIVC with additional circular dressing material prolongs the duration of PIVC stay at the site. It is recommended that this study be conducted with a different patient population and multicenter.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTintervention group (Elastane circular dressing on sterile transparent dressing)

A circular dressing made of elastane material was placed on the patients in the intervention group on a sterile transparent dressing to provide additional fixation on the peripheral intravenous catheter.

Sponsors

Ege University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

In our study, a comparison was made of PIVCs applied to patients in the control (fixation of PIVC with a sterile transparent dressing) and intervention (fixation of PIVC with a sterile transparent dressing and application of an elastane circular dressing on it) groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals between the ages of 18-65 * Literate individuals * Individuals who can communicate and fully focus * Individuals without vision, hearing or perception problems

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals hospitalized for less than 72 hours * Individuals with edema degree 2 and above * Individuals receiving Total Parenteral Nutrition, colloid, blood products * Individuals with a BMI level of 29.9 and above (obese)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Skin Penetration Difficulty Rating Scalefour monthsThe Numerical Rating Scale was used by the investigator who performed the peripheral intravenous catheterization attempt to evaluate the severity of difficulty penetrating the skin. It is a scale with numbers from 1 to 10, with 1 (easy) on one end and 10 (very difficult) on the other end. After PIVC application, the difficulty of penetrating the skin during catheter insertion was evaluated by the researcher, scoring between 1 and 10.
Visual Infusion Phlebitis Diagnostic Scalefour monthsVisual Infusion Phlebitis Diagnosis Scale includes grading steps and the symptoms of phlebitis seen at each stage in case of observation of the catheter for possible risks while applying treatment with a peripheral intravenous catheter or in case of phlebitis development. On this scale, symptoms of phlebitis such as redness, pain, swelling, fever and stiffness are rated from 1 to 5.
Infiltration Rating Scalefour monthsThe infiltration rating scale is used to determine the development and extent of infiltration. On the infiltration scale, infiltration development is graded between 0 and 4 points.
Data Collection Form for the Patient Who Had a Peripheral Intravenous Catheterfour monthsIn this form, information such as the patient's age, gender, weight, height, BMI (Body Mass Index), diagnosis, chronic disease, date and time of PIVC application, date and time of PIVC termination, reason for PIVC termination, and the region where PIVC was applied were recorded.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026