Skip to content

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Perimeniscal Steroid and 5% Dextrose Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Perimeniscal Steroid and Dextrose Injections in Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06308887
Enrollment
31
Registered
2024-03-13
Start date
2023-10-02
Completion date
2024-03-02
Last updated
2024-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gonarthrosis, Meniscus; Degeneration, Pain, Chronic

Brief summary

Introduction: The primary goal of treating knee osteoarthritis is to reduce pain and improve the patient's quality of life. Medial meniscal extrusion is a condition that is linked to pain and disability in knee osteoarthritis and can be identified through ultrasound. For patients with medial meniscal extrusion, perimeniscal corticosteroid injection has been shown to be a helpful addition to primary treatment for moderate to severe pain relief. Dextrose prolotherapy has also been found to provide periarticular benefits for knee osteoarthritis. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided perimeniscal corticosteroid and perimeniscal dextrose injections in patients with osteoarthritis, medial knee pain, and medial meniscal extrusion. Method: Patients with medial knee pain and meniscal extrusion were randomly divided into two groups using the double-block randomization method. Group 1 included 15 patients who were administered an ultrasound-guided perimeniscal steroid injection, while Group 2 included 16 patients who were administered an ultrasound-guided perimeniscal dextrose injection. The patients' pain levels were evaluated using the Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) before and one week, one month, and three months after the injection.

Interventions

Ultrasound-guided periarticular (perimeniscal) injection: The injections were administered using ultrasonic guidance on the longitudinal axis while the patient was in a supine position with the knee flexed at approximately 20°-30°. The transducer was positioned longitudinally in the region where extrusion was seen along the medial collateral ligament. Subsequently, employing a free-hand method, a 0.60x60 mm 23 G needle was inserted directly into the meniscus wall with the use of sonographic guidance. After the needle made contact with the medial meniscus wall, it was pulled back by 1 mm and placed between the medial collateral ligament and the medial meniscus, and a dose of 0.5 mg/5 ml of triamcinolone acetonide was injected.

Ultrasound-guided periarticular (perimeniscal) injection: The injections were administered using ultrasonic guidance on the longitudinal axis while the patient was in a supine position with the knee flexed at approximately 20°-30°. The transducer was positioned longitudinally in the region where extrusion was seen along the medial collateral ligament. Subsequently, employing a free-hand method, a 0.60x60 mm 23 G needle was inserted directly into the meniscus wall with the use of sonographic guidance. After the needle made contact with the medial meniscus wall, it was pulled back by 1 mm and placed between the medial collateral ligament and the medial meniscus, and a dose of 5 ml of 5% dextrose was injected.

Sponsors

Kastamonu University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Grade 2-4 knee osteoarthritis, * Aged 40 to 79 * Chronic medial knee pain persisting for more than 3 months. * Ultrasound screening found medial meniscal extrusion of more than 3 mm * A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of at least 4.

Exclusion criteria

a skin infection at the injection site, a prior history of inflammatory arthropathy, a prior history of knee injection within the last 3 months, knee synovitis pes anserine bursitis scheduled for surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue ScaleAt the beginning, 1.,4., 12. weekThe pain VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, used to record patients' pain progression or compare pain severity between patients with similar conditions.VAS is comprised of a horizontal line of 10 cm in length. A measurement of 0 cm indicates the absence of pain, whereas a measurement of 10 cm signifies the most severe pain that one can conceive. Patients are instructed to assess the intensity of discomfort by indicating a point on this line.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis IndexAt the beginning, 1.,4., 12. weekThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) is widely used in the evaluation of hip and knee osteoarthritis. It is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: pain, stiffness, and physical function. The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4, which corresponds to: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4). The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for pain, 0-8 for stiffness, and 0-68 for physical function. Usually, a sum of the scores for all three subscales gives a total WOMAC score, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026