Skip to content

Evaluation of Maxillary Molar Distalization With Two Bone Supported Protocols Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Evaluation of Maxillary Molar Distalization With Two Bone Supported Protocols Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06308640
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-03-13
Start date
2024-03-10
Completion date
2026-07-10
Last updated
2026-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Class II Malocclusion

Keywords

Molar Distalization, Fast Back Distalizer, Leaf Spring Self-Activated Expander

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to to evaluate and compare the skeletal and dental changes of bone supported Fast Back and bone supported modified Leaf Spring Self-Activated Expander in bilateral distalization of maxillary molars using CBCT in Egyptian people. The main question it aims to answer are: • If bone supported Fast Back and bone supported modified Leaf Spring Self-Activated Expander will be effective in bilateral distalization of maxillary molars The patients will be selected according to the following criteria: 1. Patient with full permanent dentition. 2. Good oral hygiene. 3. None of the patients had received any orthodontic treatment. 4. Class II molar relationship. 5. Minimal or no crowding in the mandibular arch. 6. Non-extraction treatment plan with molar distalization. 7. Low angle cases. 8. No medical problems or active periodontal disease. Researchers will compare between bone supported Fast Back appliance and bone supported modified Leaf Spring Self-Activated and see if they will be effective in maxillary molars distalization.

Detailed description

The patients will be divided into two groups: Group 1: Consisted of 10 patients, their upper molar will be distalized with bone suppored Fast Back (Fast Back Rapid Distalizer, leone, s.p.a, Italy). Group 2: Consisted of 10 patients, their upper molar will be distalized with bone supported modified Leaf Spring Self-Activated Expander. (Leaf Self Expander, leone, s.p.a, Italy). * Assessment of the 3D dentoskeletal treatment effects of the palatally bone supported Fast Back and palatally bone supported modified Leaf Spring Self-Activated Expander will be performed by using the CBCT scans. * Pretreatment CBCT (T1) and post-distalization until study completion with an average of 1 year (T2) for each subject All data will be collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed using the SPSS.

Interventions

DEVICEFast Back Rapid Distalizer

The Fast Back Rapid Distalizer (Leone S.p.A., Italy) was inserted intraorally following molar band cementation. Two palatal miniscrews (2.0 × 13 mm) were placed under local anesthesia and engaged into the eyelets of the anterior arms of the appliance to provide skeletal anchorage. The appliance was reactivated monthly (one turn per side) until bilateral Class I or cusp-to-cusp molar relationship was achieved.

DEVICEModified Leaf Spring Self-Activated Expander

The Modified Leaf Spring Self-Activated Expander (Leaf Self Expander, Leone S.p.A., Italy) was inserted intraorally following molar band cementation. Two palatal miniscrews (2.0 × 13 mm) were placed under local anesthesia and engaged into the eyelets of the anterior arms of the appliance. Upon insertion, the two retaining staples were removed to activate the superelastic NiTi leaf springs. No further reactivation was required throughout treatment.

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Intervention model description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the treatment effects of two bone supported protocols for bilateral distalization of maxillary molars in patients exhibiting class II pattern using Fast Back appliance and modified Leaf Spring Self-Activated Expander

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with full permanent dentition. * Good oral hygiene. * Class II molar relationship. * Non-extraction treatment plan with molar distalization. * Low angle cases. * medical problems or active periodontal disease.

Exclusion criteria

* The patients had received any orthodontic treatment. * Crowding in the mandibular arch. * Medical problems or active periodontal disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Linear distalization of maxillary teeth relative to pterygoid vertical (PTV) planeThrough study completion, maximum 18 monthsDistance of maxillary teeth (UR/UL 6, 5, 4, 3, 1) crown tips from PTV plane measured by CBCT. Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
Angular inclination of maxillary teeth relative to Frankfort horizontal (FH) planeThrough study completion, maximum 18 monthsInclination of long axis of maxillary teeth (UR/UL 6, 5, 4, 3, 1) relative to FH plane measured by CBCT Unit of Measure: Degrees
Molar relationship at end of distalization phaseThrough study completion, maximum 18 monthsClinical assessment of bilateral molar relationship categorized as Class I or cusp-to-cusp upon completion of the distalization phase

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sagittal skeletal parametersThrough study completion, maximum 18 months.Angular measurements including SNA, SNB, ANB, and SN-Pog assessed on CBCT-derived lateral cephalometric views. Unit of Measure: Degrees
Vertical skeletal parametersThrough study completion, maximum 18 monthsAngular and linear measurements including SN-MP, FH-MP, LAFH, TAFH, PFH, LAFH/TAFH ratio, and PFH/TAFH ratio assessed on CBCT-derived lateral cephalometric views Unit of Measure: Degrees and millimeters
Overjet and overbiteThrough study completion, maximum 18 monthsHorizontal and vertical overlap of maxillary and mandibular incisors measured clinically at baseline (T1) and end of distalization phase (T2) Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
Vertical position of mesiobuccal and distobuccal cusps of maxillary first molarsThrough study completion, maximum 18 monthsHeights of mesiobuccal (MBU R6, MBU L6) and distobuccal (DBU R6, DBU L6) cusps of maxillary first molars relative to Frankfort horizontal plane measured by CBCT Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
Arch depth and arch perimeterThrough study completion, maximum 18 monthsLinear measurements of maxillary arch depth and arch perimeter assessed on CBCT-derived arch models Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
Axial inclinations of maxillary first molars and first premolarsThrough study completion, maximum 18 monthsAxial angular measurements of maxillary right and left first molars (UR6, UL6) and first premolars (UR4, UL4) in the axial plane measured by CBCT Unit of Measure: Degrees
Treatment durationThrough study completion, maximum 18 monthsTotal active distalization period from appliance insertion to achievement of bilateral Class I or cusp-to-cusp molar relationship. Unit of Measure: Months

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSafaa M Gaballah, Professor

Tanta University

STUDY_DIRECTORShaimaa M Elmarhoumy, professor

Tanta University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 5, 2026