Skip to content

Restoring Grasp Ability in Stroke Survivors Through MI-Based Training

Restoring Grasp Ability in Stroke Survivors Through Motor Imagery-Based Training With EEG Feedback

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06307834
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-03-13
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2024-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

Stroke is a leading cause of disability. Most stroke survivors face challenge in using their arm and hand to carry out daily task, such as grasping or holding objects. This issue makes it tough for nearly 65% of stroke survivors to return to work and take care of themselves. The cause of their disability is changes in their brain's activity patterns of the motor cortex area. Traditional therapy does not directly alter these brain changes, which makes it less effective. As a way to help stroke survivors, people are looking into ways to train the brain directly. A method they found is motor imagery, which involves mental practicing of a task. Studies suggest that this type of training can potentially alter the brain's patterns, which can be seen through EEG. An EEG shows a fixed pattern during movement, called SMR (sensory motor rhythm). Studies have found that people can learn to control this SMR through mental practice of a task. The SMR changes in a similar way during both movement and motor imagery. Therefore, mental practice of hand tasks can lead to improvement in actual hand movements. It has already been shown that stroke survivors can open their hands more easily after receiving SMR training. Along with that, they also have trouble to hold and release objects. SMR training may be able to address these issues by changing brain patterns. But it is not clear yet if SMR training can improve all three stages of grasping (open, close, release), and to what extent it can enhance overall hand function. This study plans to include 20 adults who have experienced a stroke and have ongoing problems with moving their hands. Half of these participants will take part in a training in which they will learn to control their SMR for three distinct hand tasks (open, close, and release). The first session will be followed by eight training sessions. To guide users toward specific changes in EEG activity, we will provide visual feedback in training. As soon as an appropriate EEG change is made, a hand exoskeleton will help them open and close their hand. The other group of 10 patients will have traditional therapy. They will do 9 sessions of hand exercises. During and after the training, we will test both groups to see how well their hand function improved. The result will help us determine which training method is better for stroke survivors.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALNeurofeedback - based therapy

This intervention will include mental practice of various hand movements accompanied by guided visual feedback, aimed at regulating brain activation patterns to facilitate the restoration of hand movements. We will also incorporate EMG signals to control a hand exoskeleton.

BEHAVIORALStandard hand exercise therapy

This intervention will include engaging in a set of particular hand exercises with the aim of enhancing hand movements.

Sponsors

North Carolina State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age between 18 - 80 years 2. Stroke-induced hand disability in one hand 3. Experienced first stroke at least 6-month prior 4. Difficulty in opening the hand & grasping objects (Stage of Hand 4 or 5 on the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment (CMSA)) 5. Ability to distinguish specific shapes and colors on a computer screen

Exclusion criteria

1. Inability to provide informed consent 2. Suffering from severe pain in the shoulder or hand 3. Having rigid contractures in the joints of the upper limbs, or orthopedic issues that prevent joint movement 4. Presence of non-stroke neurological diseases 5. Presence of severe cognitive deficits, such as unilateral spatial neglect or aphasia 6. Experience of hand disability due to reasons other than stroke 7. Having other serious medical conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of Box & Block test (BBT)Change of value from before the intervention to immediately after the interventionA quick, simple and inexpensive test used to assess and monitor unilateral gross manual dexterity
Change of Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)Change of value from before the intervention to immediately after the interventionA standardized measure used to assess upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
Change of Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)Change of value from before the intervention to immediately after the interventionA standardized, quantitative assessment used to assess upper extremity (UE) motor ability through timed and functional tasks

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactDerek G Kamper, PhD
dgkamper@ncsu.edu7735201233
Backup ContactRinku Roy, PhD
rroy2@ncsu.edu2127314114

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026