Skip to content

Viral Immunity in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Monitoring Of The Response To Hepatitis B Booster Vaccination

Viral Immunity in TrAnsplanted Patients Depending on iMmunosupressIon

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06307808
Acronym
VITAMIN
Enrollment
66
Registered
2024-03-13
Start date
2024-03-15
Completion date
2025-10-01
Last updated
2024-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HBV, Kidney Transplantation, Liver Transplantation

Keywords

Hepatitis B virus, Kidney transplantation, Liver transplantation, Tacrolimus, Belatacept, HBV

Brief summary

Solid Organ Transplantation (SOT) is made possible by the use of a lifelong immunosuppressive treatment. This treatment limits the response of the immune system, enabling long-term survival of the transplanted organ, but also leading to weaker anti-infectious responses. In this study, we will compare the response to a booster Hepatitis B vaccination (HBV) in SOT patients, either after kidney or liver transplantation. We will also compare the immune response depending on the immunosuppressive treatment. In order to provide a detailed picture of the immune response, we will investigate the usual serological response (anti-HBs antibodies), but also the cellular memory (both T and B) using ELISpot assays and flow-cytometry, over a 6 months period following booster vaccination.

Detailed description

Solid Organ Transplantation (SOT) is the reference treatment for end stage kidney disease (Kidney Transplantation, KT) and liver failure (Liver Transplantation, LT). As of 2023, an immunosuppressive treatment remains mandatory for long-term graft survival. This treatment translates into a weaker response to vaccines. The recent example of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrom (SARS) - Coronavirus (CoV), SARS-CoV-2, showed different vaccinal responses depending on the immunosuppressive drug, comparing belatacept- to tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-vaccination is recommended in chronic kidney failure and liver failure. However, post-transplantation, a loss of HBV seroprotection is seen in \ 30 % of the patients. A booster HBV vaccine dose is recommended in such case, but the evaluation of the response to this booster dose is limited. In the Viral Immunity in TrAnsplanted patients depending on iMmunosupressIoN (VITAMIN) study, investigators will investigate the effect of a HBV-vaccine booster on the immune system, comparing KT recipients treated with Belatacept with KT and LT recipients treated with Tacrolimus. The VITAMIN study is a prospective observational study recruiting KT and LT recipients from the time of a booster HBV vaccine injection and over the following 6 months. The idea is to take advantage of this very particular sensitizing event, at a defined timepoint, to investigate the immune response to HBV through vaccination. Investigators will focus on comparing the immunological state before and after vaccination, in kidney and liver transplant recipients receiving immunosuppression. The immunological state will be described through 1/ the antibody response, 2/ its phenotype (both exploring the T cell compartment and the B cell compartment, including memory B cells, using flow cytometry) and 3/ its functional response (through the ELISpot assessment of the T response against HBV HBs antigen). Sequential blood samples will be taken, using Peripheral Blood Monocytic Cells (PBMC). Also, investigators will focus on HBV-specific memory B cells, to detect potential antibody secreting cells. This project will provide a longitudinal picture of all immune compartments stimulated by HBV vaccination. This longitudinal picture will be compared between tacrolimus-treated KT and LT recipients and belatacept-treated KT recipients. The main objective is to compare the serological response (anti-HBs antibodies) between tacrolimus- and belatacept-treated patients. The secondary objective is to describe and compare the phenotype and functional T and B responses between tacrolimus- and belatacept-treated patients. Comparing different immunosuppressive regimen through the immunological responses, investigators aim at improving the personalization of the immunosuppressive treatment.

Interventions

DRUGTacrolimus

Immunosuppressive drug: main immunosuppressant is a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), namely tacrolimus

DRUGBelatacept

Immunosuppressive drug: main immunosuppressant is a costimulation inhibitor, namely belatacept

Sponsors

National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis (ANRS)
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Kidney or liver transplant recipients * Grenoble University Hospital regular follow-up * Tacrolimus or belatacept treated * Clinical indication for HBV booster vaccination

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or lactating woman * History of HBV infection (either anti-Hepatitis B capside antigen (HBc), positivity or HBV-DNA positivity)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Titer of anti-HBs ELISA antibodyFrom enrollment to 6 months after inclusionAnti-HBs HBV serological response

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of anti-HBs memory B cellsFrom enrollment to 6 months post-enrollmentB-ELISpot anti-HBs memory B cells

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactThomas JOUVE, MD, PhD
tjouve@chu-grenoble.fr+33 4 76 76 54 60
Backup ContactMathilde BUGNAZET, BSc
mbugnazet@chu-grenoble.fr+33 4 76 76 54 60

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026