Skip to content

Bougie Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone on First-attempt Intubation Success in Prehospital Emergency Intubation (BETA Trial)

Bougie Versus Endotracheal Tube Alone on First-attempt Intubation Success in Prehospital Emergency Intubation in Patients Without Predictors of Difficult Intubation (BETA Trial)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06307392
Acronym
BETA
Enrollment
710
Registered
2024-03-12
Start date
2024-03-26
Completion date
2027-03-31
Last updated
2026-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Failure Requiring Intubation

Keywords

Bougie, Intubation, Acute Respiratory failure, Airway, Critical Care

Brief summary

Emergency intubation is routinely performed in the prehospital setting. Airway management in the prehospital setting has substantial challenges, such as hostile environment or lack of technical support in case of first attempt intubation failure, and inherent risk of complications, such as hypoxemia, aspiration or oesophageal intubation. This risk is higher when several attempts are needed to succeed endotracheal intubation. Thus, a successful first attempt intubation is highly desirable to avoid adverse intubation-related events. Noteworthy, prehospital emergency intubation is associated with a lower rate of first attempt intubation success when compared to emergency intubation in the emergency department (ED). Research is needed to overcome the specific challenges of airway management in the prehospital setting, and to improve the safety and efficiency of prehospital emergency intubation. Literature reports that the use of assistive devices such as bougie may increase the rate of first-attempt intubation success in the ED. To date, no randomized trial has ever studied this device in the prehospital setting. Thus, the aim of the BETA trial is to compare first attempt intubation success facilitated by the bougie versus the endotracheal tube alone in the prehospital setting.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFirst intubation attempt with endotracheal tube plus bougie

Use of a straight, malleable, semirigid bougie on first-attempt intubation. The required bougie is at least 60cm length, a coudé tip is recommended but not required. Operator may choose whether to bend the bougie prior to intubation. During laryngoscopy, the operator will insert the bougie into the trachea under direct or indirect visual control. If the bougie is successfully placed in the trachea, an assistant will load the endotracheal tube directly over the bougie while the operator will manually stabilize the bougie. Once the bougie has reached the mouth, the assistant will then stabilize the bougie, and the operator will advance the tube through the vocal cords to the adequate depth in the trachea, without removing the laryngoscope from the mouth. The operator will inflate the cuff and manually stabilize the tube. Then, the assistant will withdraw the bougie from the endotracheal tube. The use of a stylet is not permitted.

PROCEDUREFirst intubation attempt with endotracheal tube alone

During laryngoscopy, the operator will insert the endotracheal tube alone into the trachea under direct or indirect visual control. The operator will advance the tube through the vocal cords to the adequate depth in the trachea, without removing the laryngoscope from the mouth. The operator will inflate the cuff and manually stabilize the tube. The use of a stylet is not permitted.

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Managed by a physician staffed mobile intensive care unit (MICU). * With an indication of emergency prehospital endotracheal intubation.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant women * Patients with a "not to be resuscitated" indication. * Patients with predictors of difficult intubation (that can be collected in the prehospital setting, including previous history of face, neck, throat surgery or pathology, limited mandibular protrusion, cervical spine trauma, facial trauma, ear-nose-throat malignancy, head or neck burns, history of previous difficult airways) for whom the use of a bougie is indicated on first intubation attempt. * Patients under guardianship, trusteeship or safeguard of justice and patients with no health insurance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of first pass success during prehospital emergency intubationWithin 10 minutes following blade introductionSuccessful intubation on first attempt

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cormack-Lehane grade of glottic view at first intubation attemptWithin 10 minutes following first blade introduction
Occurrence of hypoxiaWithin 1 hour following intubationSpO2 (pulsed oxygen saturation) \<90%
Occurrence of bradycardiaWithin 1 hour following intubationHeart rate \<50 bpm
Occurrence of cardiac arrestWithin 1 hour following intubation
Occurrence of deathWithin 1 hour following intubation
Occurrence of pulmonary aspirationsWithin 1 hour following intubation
Occurrence of severe cardiovascular collapseWithin 1 hour following intubationSystolic blood pressure less than 65mmHg recorded at least once or less than 90 mmHg lasting 30 minutes despite 500-1,000 ml of fluid loading (crystalloids) or requiring introduction or increasing doses by more than 30% of vasoactive support
Time between blade introduction to the confirmation of a correct tube placementWithin 15 minutes following blade introductionIn minutes. The correct position of the endotracheal tube is confirmed by detection of end-tidal carbon dioxide.
Change in SpO2 (pulsed oxygen saturation) from the time of induction to lowest SpO2 up to 2 minutes after confirmation of correct tube placementWithin 15 minutes following inductionIn percentage
Number of laryngoscopies attempts to achieve correct endotracheal tube placementWithin 30 minutes following first blade introduction
Number of patients for whom the placement of an endotracheal tube was not possible in the pre-hospital settingWithin 30 minutes following first blade introduction
Difficulty perceived by the operator on first intubation attemptWithin 10 minutes following blade introduction3-point Likert scale
Occurrence of injuriesWithin 24 hours following intubationOccurrence (yes/no) of injuries related to the intubation: mucosal bleeding, laryngeal, tracheal, bronchial, mediastinal or oesophageal injuries
Occurrence of complicationsWithin 48 hours following intubationOccurrence (yes/no) of complications related to the intubation: aspiration pneumonia (new opacity on chest imaging within 48 hours after intubation, in comparison to the first chest imaging after hospital admission), pneumothorax (new air collection within the pleural cavity on chest imaging)
Occurrence of change in SpO2 of more than 3% from the time of induction to 2 minutes after confirmation of correct tube placementWithin 15 minutes following induction
Change of SpO2/FiO2 ratio (pulsed oxygen saturation / fraction of inspired oxygen) between the time of confirmation of correct tube placement and the minimum ratioWithin one hour after confirmation of correct tube placementSpO2/FiO2 collected every 10 minutes to determine the minimum ratio

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTQuentin LE BASTARD, MD
quentin.lebastard@chu-nantes.fr0240087839
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORQuentin LE BASTARD, MD

Nantes University Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026