Skip to content

Differents Laser Applications on Plantar Fasciitis

Effects of Differents Laser Applications on Plantar Fasciitis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06305507
Acronym
FASLaser
Enrollment
24
Registered
2024-03-12
Start date
2024-01-01
Completion date
2024-09-23
Last updated
2026-01-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fasciitis, Plantar

Keywords

Fascitis Plantar, Focused laser therapy, Randomized Clinical trial, Doubled blinded, Longitudinal, Pain reduction, Therapeutic, Session duration, Comparision group

Brief summary

The objective of this randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) with a double-blind technique and longitudinal chronology, is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of High intensity laser therapy (HILT) in static mode versus scanning mode in the reduction of pain associated with plantar fasciitis. The main questions it seeks to answer are: * What is the comparative effectiveness between low-level laser therapy in local spot mode and sweep mode in reducing pain in patients with plantar fasciitis? * What are the optimal therapeutic parameters (session duration, frequency and power) for LLLT in both modes, maximizing pain reduction in patients with plantar fasciitis? Participants in this study will perform the following tasks: * Undergo HILT sessions or scanning mode. * Comply with the instructions on the duration and frequency of the sessions. * Record the pain levels experienced before and after each session. The investigators will compare the group this differents laser to evaluate whether there are significant differences in pain reduction effects.

Detailed description

This randomized controlled clinical trial, titled 'Effect of Different Laser Applications on Plantar Fasciitis', aims to specifically address the effectiveness of static mode versus scanning mode (HILT) in the treatment of pain associated with plantar fasciitis. Using a rigorous methodology that includes double-blind masking and a longitudinal chronology, the study focuses on comparing two modes of laser application. The main objective is to evaluate and compare the pain reduction between these two modes of application of LLLT. To achieve this, key questions are asked, such as the relative effectiveness of each mode and the identification of optimal therapeutic parameters, including session duration, frequency and power, that maximize benefits in patients with plantar fasciitis. Participants in this study will undergo low-level laser therapy sessions, following the protocols established for each mode of application. Additionally, they will be asked to record their pain levels before and after each session, providing valuable information about the effectiveness of the therapy. In the case of a comparison group, a detailed evaluation will be carried out comparing the results obtained between the group treated with static in local spot mode and the group treated in scanning mode. This approach will allow researchers to determine if there are significant differences in the pain reduction effects between the two modes of laser application. With a solid experimental design and specific objectives, this study seeks to contribute significantly to the understanding of laser applications in the treatment of plantar fasciitis, providing valuable information for the optimization of therapy and thus improving the quality of life of patients. . affected.

Interventions

OTHERStatic therapy

The intervention involves the precise and focused application of HILT on specific areas related to plantar fasciitis. The static mode technique is characterized by directing the laser directly to the painful point, seeking optimal stimulation in the affected region.The Scanning Mode technique is characterized by applying the HILT through a continuous, sweeping movement of the handpiece over the target area

OTHERStatic Mode

The Scanning Mode technique is characterized by applying the HILT through a continuous, sweeping movement of the handpiece over the target area (the plantar fascia and adjacent tender regions). This application ensures a more uniform energy distribution across a larger tissue area, potentially addressing inflammation and pain in a broader region than the static mode. The total dose is distributed over the area treated with a continuous motion.

Sponsors

University of Seville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Randomized Pilot Study with Two Parallel Groups. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups (High-Intensity Laser Therapy in Static Mode or High-Intensity Laser Therapy in Scanning Mode) to receive 12 treatment sessions over a 40-day period. This is a single-blind design, where participants were blinded to the type of laser application received.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed Diagnosis of Plantar Fasciitis (at least 8 weeks), adults,

Exclusion criteria

* Additional Serious Medical Conditions, Not receiving treatment at the time of the study for plantar fasciitis, neither, serious disease, a score of \>3 on the DN4 questionnaire neuropathic pain, neither Pregnancy or lactation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual pain analogic scale1,2 and 4 monthsVisual pain scale from 0 minimum (best) to 10 maximum (worse)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ultrasound image of thickness1,2 and 4 monthsfascia thickness measured by ultrasound from minumum of 3 (Best) to maximum of 6 mm (Worse)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026