Skip to content

Comparison Between Drinking Water and Normal Saline in Irrigating Traumatic Wound

Comparison Between Drinking Water and Normal Saline in Irrigating Traumatic Wound: Noninferiority Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06304272
Enrollment
440
Registered
2024-03-12
Start date
2024-03-31
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2024-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trauma

Keywords

Traumatic Wound, Wound Infection

Brief summary

There is a controversy regarding the roles of the Normal saline and Tap water in irrigation of the wound. It has been suggested that antiseptic solution including normal saline has cytotoxic effect while tap water damages the fibroblast. There are no high level evidence to support one type of solution over other, systematic review have found no difference in wound infection between irrigation with normal saline vs tap water. There are ten randomized controlled trial comparing tap water with normal saline for irrigating wound published between 1992 to 2016. These RCT are analyzed in three systemic review and meta-analysis published on 2016, 2019, 2022, which showed that tap water and normal saline has no difference in terms of infection rate. The infection rate observed in various studies ranges from 0-11.5% in normal saline group and 0-12.6% in tap water group with no statistically significant difference.

Detailed description

There is a controversy regarding the roles of the Normal saline and Tap water in irrigation of the wound. It has been suggested that antiseptic solution including normal saline has cytotoxic effect while tap water damages the fibroblast. There are no high level evidence to support one type of solution over other, systematic review have found no difference in wound infection between irrigation with normal saline vs tap water. There are ten randomized controlled trial comparing tap water with normal saline for irrigating wound published between 1992 to 2016. These RCT are analyzed in three systemic review and meta-analysis published on 2016, 2019, 2022, which showed that tap water and normal saline has no difference in terms of infection rate. The infection rate observed in various studies ranges from 0-11.5% in normal saline group and 0-12.6% in tap water group with no statistically significant difference. The published study has looked into tap water which may not be equivalent to drinking water in our setup, therefore the investigators are looking into drinking water that is bacteriologically safe. Out of published RCTs there is only one done in acute traumatic wound with good sample size and study design. This study is purposed to look into acute traumatic wound with proper randomization, allocation and concealment. Moreover, this is a non-inferiority trial, therefore if it is proven that drinking water is non-inferior to normal saline then, it will be easily available modality of wound irrigation in Low-Middle-Income country like Nepal.

Interventions

PROCEDUREIrrigating Traumatic Wound with Drinking Water

Irrigating Traumatic Wound with Drinking Water and Normal Saline

Sponsors

Patan Academy of Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Intervention model description

Randomized, double blinded, parallel, non-inferiority trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Laceration wound presenting within 6 hours of duration * Lacerations involving upper and lower limbs, scalps, head and neck

Exclusion criteria

* Lacerations involving, lips, ears, mucosal surface, perineal and peri anal region * Punctured or penetrating wound * Bite wounds by human or animals or snakes * Dirty wound requiring surgical debridement * Patient requiring irrigation of wound with more than 1 liter of fluid * Wounds involving tendon, joint or bone * Wound associated with open fracture * Patient on corticosteroid, antibiotics or immunosuppressant * Patient who are not able to come for follow-up * Immunocompromised patient * Patient with history of significant peripheral vascular disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison between drinking water and normal saline in irrigating traumatic wound: Noninferiority trial.3-7 DaysDifference in wound infection rates between the two randomized groups. Wound evaluation was based on the following criteria No infection: 1. No discharge or fever on day 3 2. Dry and no fever on day 7 Infection 1\. Fever greater than 1000 F or pus discharge on any day 2. Erythema with serous discharge on any day

Contacts

Primary ContactAshis Shrestha, Fellow
ashisshrestha@pahs.edu.np9851061846
Backup ContactSumana Bajracharya, Fellow
sumanabajracharya@pahs.edu.np9841359823

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026