Skip to content

Effect of Intermittent Oral Enteral Nutrition Tube in Tracheostomized Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Comparative Study of Effect of Intermittent Oral Enteral Nutrition Tube in Tracheostomized Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06304051
Enrollment
118
Registered
2024-03-12
Start date
2023-01-17
Completion date
2023-06-01
Last updated
2024-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Brief summary

This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trail involved tracheostomized patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical effect of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding vs Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Tracheostomized Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. The main questions it aims to answer are: Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, can the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding better improve the nutritional status, extubation of tracheostomy tube, pulmonary infection, neurological deficit of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, is the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding safer. Participants will be divided into two groups randomly, with different nutritional support respectively.

Detailed description

Safe and efficient enteral nutrition support for tracheostomized patients with intracerebral hemorrhage continues to be a challenge.The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical effect of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding vs Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Tracheostomized Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. The main questions it aims to answer are: Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, can the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding better improve the nutritional status, extubation of tracheostomy tube, pulmonary infection, neurological deficit of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, is the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding safer. Participants will be divided into two groups randomly, with different nutritional support respectively.

Interventions

DEVICEIntermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding

Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm. However, the specific depth should be evaluated based on patients' feedback and adjusted accordingly. After insertion, the tail part of the tube should be put into a container full of water and the absence of continuous bubbles indicated a successful intubation. Then, the feeding was to be conducted three times per day with 50 ml per minute and 400-600ml for each feeding.

DEVICENasogastric Tube Feeding

Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the patient's cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time. The total feeding volume was determined based on daily requirements. The feeding content was formulated by the nutritionists based on the patient's condition and relevant guidelines to reach the energy demand as 20-25 kcal/kg/day and protein supplementation of 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day for both two groups. For patients with limited tube feeding compliance, the investigators made appropriate adjustments to ensure that they were not at risk of severe malnutrition as much as possible.

Sponsors

Muhammad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* meeting the diagnostic criteria for Intracerebral Hemorrhage. * with placement of a tracheotomy tube. * requiring enteral nutrition support. * age over 18 years. * able to cooperate with treatment and questionnaire investigation.

Exclusion criteria

* combined with tumors in the head, neck, esophagus, or gastrointestinal tract * an abnormal structure observed in the oral, pharyngeal, nasal regions or esophagus * with unstable vital signs or severe dysfunction of organs including heart, liver, lungs, or kidneys * with severe hemorrhagic disease or bleeding tendency; * with dysphagia caused by non-stroke-related reasons in the past

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of cases of successful extubationday 30The Number of tracheostomized patients for both groups was recorded and compared. The parameters or criteria for extubation were: 1) stable clinical condition and a respiratory rate of 12-22 breaths per minute. 2) strong coughing ability and minimal airway secretions. 3) after completing a trial of tracheostomy tube capping, patients showed no fever, dyspnea, or asthma within 72 hours. Additionally, their blood oxygen saturation remained above 95% and normal oxygen partial pressure was observed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemoglobin levelday 1 and day 30Hemoglobin was recorded via blood routine test.(Hb, mg/L)
Body mass indexday 1 and day 30Weight and height will be combined to report Body mass index in kg/m\^2
Serum albumin levelday 1 and day 30Serum albumin was recorded via blood routine test.(Alb, g/L)
Clinical Pulmonary Infection Scoreday 1 and day 30The Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score was recruited for evaluation, with specific assessment indicators such as body temperature, white blood cell count, respiratory secretions, chest X-rays, oxygenation index. The total scores ranged from 0 to 12, with a higher score indicated a more severe pulmonary infection

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026