Skip to content

Comparing MRI-Ultrasound Fusion and Cognitive-guided Biopsy for the Detection of csPCa: the PROFUSION Trial

A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing MRI-Ultrasound Fusion and Cognitive-guided Biopsy for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: the PROFUSION Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06303622
Enrollment
1250
Registered
2024-03-12
Start date
2025-01-08
Completion date
2027-03-31
Last updated
2026-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

This study is an international multicentre RCT to compare the linically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection of cognitive-guided and MRI-USG guided biopsies in men with suspicious MRI lesion.

Detailed description

This study is an international multicentre RCT to compare the csPCa detection of cognitive-guided and MRI-USG guided biopsies in men with suspicious MRI lesion. This is a phase III randomised controlled trial to evaluate the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) by MRI-USG fusion approach (MRUS arm) versus Cognitive-guided approach (COG arm). The study hypothesis is that MRUS arm is superior to COG arm in detecting csPCa. The result of this RCT would impact how MRI-guided prostate biopsies should be done in the future. If the MRI-USG fusion approach is superior to cognitive-guidance in csPCa detection, it should be the standard of practice in the future, and dedicated MRI-USG fusion equipment should be available in centres performing prostate biopsies.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMRI-USG fusion approach

MRI-USG fusion approach prostate biopsy

PROCEDURECognitive-guided approach

Cognitive-guided approach prostate biopsy

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, China
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
China Medical University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Poland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Kaohsiung Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Tuen Mun Hospital Hong Kong
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
CollaboratorOTHER
Stanford Cancer Institute
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men ≥18 years of age * Clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and indicated for prostate biopsy * Serum Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) \< 20 ng/mL * Digital rectal examination ≤ cT2 (organ-confined cancer) * Able to provide written informed consent * MRI prostate (contrast or plain) showing 1-3 suspicious lesion(s) with PI-RADS score 3-5

Exclusion criteria

* Prior prostate biopsy in the 2 years before screening visit * Prior diagnosis of prostate cancer * Contraindicated to prostate biopsy: active urinary tract infection, failed insertion of transrectal ultrasound probe into rectum (abdominal perineal resection, anal stenosis), uncorrectable coagulopathy, antiplatelet or anticoagulant which cannot be stopped (continue low-dose aspirin before and after biopsy is permitted) * Patient refusal for biopsy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of men with clinically significant Prostate cancer(csPCa)When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsyISUP Grade 2 or above prostate cancer diagnosed on biopsy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa in MRI lesions with maximal size ≤10mm versus >10mmWhen histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsyMRI lesions with maximal size ≤10mm versus \>10mm
Proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa in prostate size of ≤50ml vs >50mWhen histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsyprostate size of ≤50ml vs \>50ml
The proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa only in targeted biopsyWhen histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsyISUP Grade 2 or above prostate cancer diagnosed on biopsy
Proportion of men with a diagnosis of csPCa only in systemic biopsyWhen histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsyISUP Grade 2 or above prostate cancer diagnosed on biopsy
Proportion of men with a diagnosis of clinically insignificant PCa,When histology results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsyISUP grade group 1 Prostate cancer diagnosed on biopsy
Procedure timeDuring biopsy procedureTotal time of procedure
Pain score on a scale of 0-10 taken after biopsyImmediately After biopsy procedureThe higher the score, the more pain
Proportion of men with post-biopsy adverse events within 30 days after biopsy30 days post biopsyThe severity of Adverse event is grade by Clavien-Dindo classification

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

CONTACTPeter Ka-Fungq CHIU, PhD
peterchiu@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk35052625
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPeter Ka-Fungq CHIU

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026