Skip to content

Effect of ESPB on Intraoperative Remifentanil Consumption

Effect of ESPB on Intraoperative Remifentanil Consumption in Lumbar Spine Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06303557
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-03-12
Start date
2024-01-31
Completion date
2025-11-13
Last updated
2025-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Erector Spinae Plane Block, Lumbar Spine Surgery, Remifentanil Consumption

Brief summary

In recent years, regional anesthesia techniques have also been frequently applied to patients for pain relief. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB), is among the regional anesthesia techniques frequently used in lumbar spine surgery. General anesthesia (GA) is the main method of anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery. However, GA can only inhibit the projection system of the cortical limbic system or hypothalamic cortex. GA cannot completely block the transmission of peripheral noxious stimulus to the central nervous system and cannot effectively inhibit the intraoperative stress response. With the addition of peripheral blocks such as ESPB, lower remifentanil consumption, and more stable hemodynamics are expected by providing preemptive analgesia in patients. As a result of all these; it was aimed to compare the intraoperative remifentanil consumption of patients who underwent preoperative ESPB in patients who will undergo lumbar spine surgery resection under GA with those who underwent postoperative ESPB.

Interventions

Erector spinae plane block will be performed bilaterally, under US guidance, before the surgical operation, after the induction of anesthesia, and when the patient is placed in the prone position.

Erector spinae plane block will be performed unilaterally, under US guidance, after the surgical operation, under general anesthesia, and when the patient is placed in the prone position.

Sponsors

Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 to 65 years old * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II-III * Body mass index 18 to 30 kg/m2 * Elective lumbar disc herniation surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Patient refusing the procedure * Patients who have previously undergone spinal surgery * Chronic opioid or analgesic use * Patients who will operate under emergency conditions * Patients who will not undergo lumbar disc herniation surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraoperative remifentanil consumptionDuring the intraoperative periodThe amount of remifentanil that patients need to maintain anesthesia during the intraoperative period will be recorded.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain scoresFirst 24 hours after surgeryPain will be assessed at rest and while coughing using the visual analog scale on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Pain assessment will be done at the 1st, 2nd, 6th, 12th, and 24th hours after surgery.
Mean arterial pressurePerioperative periodMean arterial pressure values will be recorded before anesthesia, before surgical incision, after surgical incision at the 5th, 30th, 60th, 90th, 120th minutes, and after general anesthesia.
Heart ratePerioperative periodHeart rate values will be recorded before anesthesia, before surgical incision, after surgical incision at the 5th, 30th, 60th, 90th, 120th minutes, and after general anesthesia.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026