Skip to content

Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment High Intensive Laser Therapy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy

Comparison of High Intensive Laser Therapy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06301152
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-03-08
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2023-05-30
Last updated
2024-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lateral Epicondylitis

Keywords

Lateral Epicondylitis, High Intensive Laser Therapy, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, Musculoskeletal ultrasound

Brief summary

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate and compare the short-term efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and extra corporeal shock wave therapy(ESWT) on pain, sensitivity, handgrip strength, and functions in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis (LE). Material and methods: Forty five participants (age range, 18 to 65 years) with unilateral elbow pain were randomized into two groups. HILT group (n = 22) and the ESWT group (n = 23). The HILT and ESWT were administered three times a week for three weeks, and each treatment was combined with exercises. All patients in both groups were evaluated with ultrasonography for common extensor tendon(CET) thickness. A visual analog scale (VAS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH), and hand grip strength test were used to evaluate the patients before, one, and six weeks after treatment.

Interventions

DEVICEhigh intensive laser

high-intensity laser ,three times in a week, for three weeks, 9 session

DEVICEextracorporeal shock wave therapy

extracorporeal shock wave therapy, once a week, for three weeks ,3 times,

Sponsors

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

two different treatment modalities were applied in two groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of Lateral epicondylitis * Age \>18

Exclusion criteria

* Operation history about elbow * Received physical therapy, or had a steroid injection to the elbow in the three months * Cervical radiculopathy, * Elbow deformities, * Fibromyalgia syndrome, * Carpal tunnel syndrome, * Neurological impairments in the upper extremity, * Chronic inflammatory conditions, * Hemophilia, * Pregnant, * History of malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analog scaleBaseline, 1 week and 6 weeksscore 0-10, 0 minimum value, mean is no pain, score 10 is maximum value, pain is very severe

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quick Disability Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionary,Baseline, 1 week and 6 weeksQuick Disability Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionary, minimum score 0 maximum score 100, high score value is associated with poor functional status
hand grip strengthBaseline, 1 week and 6 weeksevaluates the maximum isometric contraction strength of hand and forearm muscles, 20-69 age male 47-40kg, female 30-24kg is normal value. ow value is associated with poor function
musculoskeletal ultrasonographyBaseline, 1 week and 6 weekscommon extensor tendon thickness;\>0.40-0.41cm measurement result is associated with thickening of the tendon

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026