Skip to content

Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube on Rehabilitation Therapy Compliance in Stroke Patients

Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube on Rehabilitation Therapy Compliance in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06299059
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-03-07
Start date
2024-03-31
Completion date
2024-07-31
Last updated
2024-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to compare Rehabilitation Therapy Compliance of ischemic stroke patients who receive enteral nutrition support through either Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube or Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an observation group or a control group, with both groups receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. The observation group will receive enteral nutrition support through Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube, while the control group will receive it through Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will then compare Rehabilitation Therapy Compliance of the two groups.

Detailed description

The study will last 15 days for each participant. The aim of this clinical trial is to compare Rehabilitation Therapy Compliance of ischemic stroke patients who receive enteral nutrition support through either Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube or Nasogastric Tube. Patients will be randomly assigned to either an observation group or a control group, with both groups receiving routine rehabilitation treatment. The observation group will receive enteral nutrition support through Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube, while the control group will receive it through Nasogastric Tube. Researchers will then compare Rehabilitation Therapy Compliance of the two groups.

Interventions

DEVICEIntermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding

The observation group was given enteral nutritional support with Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube according to the following procedure: Before each feeding, inside and outside of the tube was cleaned with water. During feeding, the patient should maintain a semi-reclining or sitting position with mouth opened, and the tube was inserted slowly and smoothly into the upper part of the esophagus by medical staffs while the appropriate depth of intubation was checked with the calibration markings on the tube wall. The distance from the incisors to the head part of the tube should be between 22-25 cm.

DEVICENasogastric Tube Feeding

The control group was given enteral nutritional support with Nasogastric Tube Feeding according to the relevant guidelines. Within 4 hours after admission, the placement of the feeding tube was conducted by professional medical staffs and after intubation, the tube was secured to the patient's cheek with medical tape. The feeding was conducted once every 3-4 hours, with 200-300ml each time.

Sponsors

Zeng Changhao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age ≥ 18 years; * meeting the diagnostic criteria of stroke; * any degree of dysphagia at admission; * steady vital signs, without severe cognitive impairment or sensory aphasia, able to cooperate with the assessment. * transferred out within three weeks of hospitalization in the neurology department.

Exclusion criteria

* complicated with other neurological diseases; * damaged mucosa or incomplete structure in nasopharynx; * tracheostomy tube plugged; * unfeasible to the support of parenteral nutrition; * simultaneously suffering from liver, kidney failure, tumors, or hematological diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rehabilitation Treatment Compliance Questionnaireday 1 and day 15The Rehabilitation Treatment Compliance Questionnaire assesses patient compliance with rehabilitation treatment plans. It consists of 12 items that cover aspects such as the patient's understanding of the treatment plan, attitude towards treatment, compliance, and perception of rehabilitation outcomes. The scoring range for The Rehabilitation Treatment Compliance Questionnaire is typically from 12 to 60 points. A higher score indicates better understanding of the treatment plan, more positive attitude towards treatment, higher compliance with the treatment plan, and better perception of rehabilitation outcomes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Health Questionnaire-9day 1 and day 15The total score of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms.
Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaireday 1 and day 15Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life, which consists of 44 items and divided into 11 main domains, including: overall satisfaction, understanding, diet, hydration, communication, respiratory issues, postoperative recovery, social impact, mental health, saliva control, and appearance. The maximum rough score was 220 points, which was converted into a standard percentage system in our study. As the scores increased, the quality of life was better.

Contacts

Primary ContactZhefeng Zeng, Master
zhengzhouzhj@qq.com19501376864
Backup ContactWeiji Zhao, Master
zwjww2009@163.com17839973473

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026