Skip to content

Motorized Fine Needle Biopsy vs Standard Needles

Comparison Between a Novel Motorized EUS Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) With Standard Needle for Pancreatic and Liver Biopsies

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06298604
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-03-07
Start date
2023-12-09
Completion date
2024-12-09
Last updated
2024-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Diseases, Pancreas Disease

Keywords

Fine-needle biopsy, Endosonography, liver, pancreas, pathology

Brief summary

Recent improvements in punctures techniques and needles now allow for the collection of high-quality specimens comparable to core needle biopsy. A newly developed motorized fine needle biopsy (mFNB), the Precision-GI (Limaca, Israel) promises intact tissue acquisition without sample damage, relying on controlled axial tissue cutting and high-speed rotational coring for optimized tissue acquisition. Given the advancement mentioned, the investigators aim to compare the performance of the mFNB with the standard needle during the acquisition of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided pancreatic and liver specimens through a prospective, interventional, single-center trial. The study will consist of two groups of patients: one assigned to the standard fine needle biopsy (FNB) and the other to the mFNB. The primary study outcomes will include sample quality (core integrity), and diagnostic accuracy.

Detailed description

The development of Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) has been remarkable. Initially focused on obtaining samples from the pancreas, it has expanded significantly to include various organs adjacent to the gastrointestinal system (i.e., liver, lymph nodes, adrenal glands). One of the key advancements in EUS-TA involves the shift from cytological analysis, with fine-needle aspiration (FNA), to histological and even genetic evaluations, with fine-needle biopsies (FNB). FNB addresses some limitations associated with FNA, such as low tumor cellularity and the inability to retain cellular architecture. Recent improvements in puncture techniques and needles, allow for the collection of high-quality specimens, comparable to core needle biopsy, to achieve standards for specimen adequacy (i.e., intact liver cores of at least 15-20 mm with a complete portal triad count of 11). Some current available needle designs include the crown type, flanged type, 20 Gauge FNB needles with forward-faced core traps, and the fork-tip needles, demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy and a low rate of adverse events. The Precision-GI is a new motorized fine needle (mFNB) developed by LIMACA Medical in Israel for EUS-guided FNB. It operates using a battery-powered motor that enables controlled axial tissue cutting and high-speed rotational coring for optimized tissue acquisition. Moreover, a sharp stylet facilitates crossing through the gastrointestinal wall, allowing for the reach of target lesions. The rotational electromechanical cutting movement into the lesion promises intact motorized tissue acquisition without sample damage. In the present study, the investigators aim to compare the performance of the mFNB with the standard needle during the acquisition of EUS-guided pancreatic and liver specimens. The study will consist of two groups of patients: one assigned to the standard fine needle biopsy (FNB) and the other to the mFNB. The primary study outcomes will include sample quality (core integrity), and diagnostic accuracy.

Interventions

DEVICEEUS-guided standard fine needle biopsy

Using the echoendoscope, a pancreatic lesion or liver parenchyma will be identified, and a 19-gauge standard fine needle biopsy device (Boston Scientific, USA) is inserted on it to obtain the sample or specimen.

DEVICEEUS-guided motorized fine needle biopsy

Using the echoendoscope, a pancreatic lesion or liver parenchyma will be identified, and a 20-gauge motorized fine needle biopsy device (Limaca, Israel) is inserted on it to obtain the sample or specimen.

Sponsors

Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Masking description

Single masking, the pathologist will be blinded to the needle used for sample collection.

Intervention model description

Prospective, diagnostic,, cross-sectional study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients between 18 and 99 years * Patients referred to our center who require EUS-guided liver or pancreas biopsy. * Male or female patients. * Patients able to give consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or nursing * Patients with coagulation disorders (platelets \<50.000/mm3, international normalised ratio (INR) \>2) * Any underlying medical condition that contraindicates EUS-guided fine needle biopsy such as anatomical alterations, significant gastric outlet obstruction, collateral intervening vessels.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy sample qualityUp to two hours after the proceduresBased on tissue core; Tissue core is defined as a architecturally intact piece of at least 550 micron in the greatest axis. The tissue core will be evaluated in both groups by the pathologist immediately after its acquisition.
Diagnostic accuracy according to histological analysisUp to one weekProportion of subjects with a definitive diagnosis based on the number of passes and throws for tissue acquisition.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tissue blood contaminationUp to one hourEvaluation of tissue blood contamination will be based on a sample quality score: 1. Only blood 2. High (\>50% of the surface of the slide) 3. Moderate (25%-50% of the surface of the slide) 4. Low (\<25% of the surface of the slide)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time efficiency during tissue acquisitionUp to two hoursThe tissue from identifying the lesion to obtaining the sample. It will be calculated in minutes
Quality of cytologic sampleUp to 2 hoursThe quality of the cytologic sample will be scored according to the pathologist criteria as: 0= insufficient material for cytologic interpretation 1. sufficient material for limited cytologic interpretation 2. sufficient material for adequate cytologic interpretation
Rate of liver specimen adequacyUp to 1 weekIntact liver cores of at least 15-20 mm with a complete portal triad count of 11
Rate of adverse events associated with the procedureUp to 6 monthsAdverse event associated with the procedure, including transprocedural, early, and late post-procedural occurrence

Countries

Ecuador

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026