Skip to content

Auditory Sensory Attenuation in Obesity

The Sensory Attenuation Paradigm in Auditory Modality in Obesity

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06298539
Acronym
Ud_SA_OB
Enrollment
37
Registered
2024-03-07
Start date
2023-03-01
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2025-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Keywords

obesity, sensory attenuation, interpersonal difficulties, sense of agency

Brief summary

The goal of this observational cross-sectional study is to test the sensory attenuation effect with auditory stimuli comparing women with obesity and healthy-weight women. Specifically, the study aims to test whether the sensory attenuation effect (i.e., the perceived loudness of a self-generated sound is weaker than when another person produces the same sound): i) is observed in obesity ii) it can be modulated in interactive action contexts, as was previously observed in healthy participants. Participants will compare the loudness of target sound with a comparison tone, which can be prompt by the participant by pressing a button on their own will (i.e., individual context) or upon the experimenter's signal (i.e., interactive context); externally-generated sounds are produced in the opposite way.

Detailed description

The perceived loudness of a self-generated sound is generally weaker than when another person produces the same sound. This effect is known as sensory attenuation, and it is considered a proof of sense of agency (i.e., it relies on the anticipation of the sensory-motor effects of one's intentional action). Recently, it was suggested that this effect is enhanced in interactive action contexts in healthy individuals, meaning that sounds are produced as a consequence of cooperation between individuals. Participants will compare the loudness of target sound with a comparison tone, which could be generated in 4 different conditions: i) participants press a button ii) the experimenter press the button iii) participants press the button upon the experimenter's signal (i.e., who touch the participants' arm) iv) the experimenter presses the button upon the participants' signal (i.e., who touch the experimenter's arm). However, it is not clear whether the same effect of cooperation can be observed also when individuals experience difficulties in social interactions and relationships. To this purpose, the study compared the sensory attenuation effect for auditory stimuli in a traditional (i.e., individual) and interactive context, comparing women with obesity and healthy-weight women. Indeed, relational difficulties and social withdrawal characterized this clinical condition.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Turin, Italy
CollaboratorOTHER
Istituto Auxologico Italiano
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* BMI > 30 kg/m2 (controls) * handedness: right

Exclusion criteria

* history of eating disorders (controls) * major psychiatric conditions (e.g., psychosis, personality disorders) * developmental disorders (e.g., autism spectrum disorders) * neurological or brain injuries disorders * motor impairments

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
point of subjective equality (PSE)day 1individual PSE in each experimental condition is obtained by fitting observed judgements of loudness, relative to seven possible comparison tones. The PSE represents the tone loudness that participants perceive as loud as the target sound (i.e., the sound intensity which records only 50% of correct judgments which sounds was louder?)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cognitive empathyday 1Interpersonal Reactivity Index - IRI: 28-item self-report questionnaire on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 -does not describe me well to 5 - describes me very well). Four components of cognitive empathy are measured: i) perspective taking (IRI-PT); ii) fantasy (IRI-F); iii) empathic concern (IRI-EC); iv) personal distress (IRI-PD); each subscale includes 7 items (total scores range from 1 to 35): the higher the score, the higher the expression of cognitive empathy described in each subscale.
interpersonal pleasureday 1Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale - ACIPS: 17-item self-reported questionnaire scored on 6-point Likert scale (from 1 - very false for me to 6-very true for me). ACIPS total score ranges from 1 to 102: higher scores indicate higher anticipatory and consummatory interpersonal pleasure.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026