Skip to content

Infusion Treatments of Chronic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

Evaluation and Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ketamine and Lidocaine Infusion in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Retrospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06297915
Enrollment
102
Registered
2024-03-07
Start date
2022-05-17
Completion date
2023-08-01
Last updated
2024-03-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuropathic Pain

Keywords

Lidocaine, Ketamine, Pain measurement, scale

Brief summary

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of ketamine and lidocaine infusion in patients with chronic peripheral neuropathic pain. Patients who received intravenous ketamine infusion and the other patient group who received intravenous lidocaine infusion were evaluated in the study. Pain scores and quality of life were assessed with scales before treatment at two weeks, two months, and six months after treatment.

Detailed description

This study, it was aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of intravenous infusion of ketamine and lidocaine, which have been known and used in pain management and which have recently increased interest in the treatment of peripheric neuropathic pain.

Interventions

DRUGKetamine

Ketamine infusion was administered at 1 mg/kg (in 1 hour)

DRUGLidocain

Lidocaine infusion was administered at 3 mg/kg (in 1 hour)

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CROSSOVER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

* 18-65 years of age * Patients with peripheral neuropathic pain (radicular neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, complex regional pain syndrome type 2, traumatic peripheral nerve injury, trigeminal neuralgia, postherpetic neuralgia) * Patients who was evaluated by DN4 scores with of ≥4 points

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with central nervous system disease . * Patients with cancer related neuropatic pain. * Patients with central neuropathic pain patterns. * Patients with renal, hepatic, cardiovascular, and psychiatric diseases. * Patients whose treatment could not be completed due to side effects or other reasons. * Patients who had lost their follow-up .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neuropathic Pain ScaleBefore treatment at two weeks, two months, and six months after treatment.The 7 symptoms items are scored by interviewing the patient.The scores are added and a score of 4 or more outout of ,10 point (severe pain ) is suggestive of neuropathic pain.Neuropathic Pain 4 Questions (DN4)
Pain Rating ScaleBefore treatment at two weeks, two months, and six months after treatment.NRS in which individuals rate their pain on an ten-point numerical scale. Zero:''no pain at all' ten-point ''severe pain''Numeric Rating Scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life ScaleBefore treatment at two weeks, two months, and six months after treatment.12-question survey PCS and the MCS Scores above 50 indicate a better-than-average health-related quality of life, while scores below 50 suggest below-average health.Short form-12 (SF-12)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026