Skip to content

Subvastus vs. Medial Parapatellar Approaches in Total Knee Arthroplasty With Quadriceps Muscle Elastography

Comparison of Early Outcomes of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasties Performed Using Subvastus and Medial Parapatellar Approaches and Evaluation of Quadriceps Muscle Elastography

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06297746
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-03-07
Start date
2023-07-10
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2024-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Total Knee Arthroplasty

Keywords

Total Knee Arthroplasty, Subvastus Approach, Medial Parapatellar Approach, Shear Wave Elastography, Elastography, Young's Modulus

Brief summary

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Knee osteoarthritis is a common joint pathology causing joint pain and ambulatory limitations. In primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgeries, medial parapatellar (MP) and subvastus (SV) approaches are frequently used. The MP approach provides good exposure and is more widely used. In the SV approach, the vastus medialis muscle is preserved. Some argue that the extensor mechanism may heal earlier with the SV approach. In this study, unlike previous studies, the investigators aimed to quantitatively compare the early outcomes of MP and SV approaches, through shear wave elastography (SWE) measurements isolated over the vastus medialis and vastus lateralis muscles. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 20 patients with indications for TKA due to primary osteoarthritis, divided into MP and SV groups. SWE measurements of the vastus medialis and vastus lateralis muscles were performed preoperatively and at 3-month follow-up. Clinical scores (Knee Society Score and WOMAC) and straight leg raising time were recorded both preoperatively and postoperatively.

Interventions

PROCEDURESubvastus approach

Subvastus approach

Medial Parapatellar approach

Sponsors

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Eligibility Criteria: Inclusion Criteria: \- Diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of secondary osteoarthritis * Uncontrolled diabetes * Uncontrolled hypertension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shear wave values3 monthUltrasonic measurements

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026