Skip to content

Safety & Feasibility of PERIsign System in Demonstrating Involuntary Muscle Defense as a Sign of Peritonitis in Subjects With Appendicitis

Safety and Feasibility of the PERIsign System in Demonstrating Involuntary Muscle Defense as a Sign of Peritonitis in Subjects With Appendicitis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06296953
Acronym
PeriSaFe01
Enrollment
40
Registered
2024-03-06
Start date
2024-03-15
Completion date
2024-08-01
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abdominal Pain, Appendicitis, Appendicitis Acute, Peritonitis

Keywords

Appendicitis, Acute abdominal pain, Peritonitis, Medical Device, PERIsign

Brief summary

This will be an explorative, proof-of-principle, open, multi-center investigation. The investigation aims to investigate the safety of the PERIsign system and the ability of physicians to differentiate between healthy individuals and subjects with involuntary muscle defense as a sign of peritonitis by utilizing PERIsign data. The investigation will include a total of 20 subjects admitted to hospital for suspected appendicitis and planned for emergency surgery and 20 healthy volunteers. Both male and female subjects aged 18-70 years will be enrolled. All subjects will undergo PERIsign examinations. Subjects with suspected appendicitis will undergo 1-2 PERIsign examinations before their planned appendectomy surgery. For the healthy volunteers, there is only 1 PERIsign examination. During each examination, 4 PERIsign curves will be obtained, one from each quadrant of the abdomen. The attending physician will interpret the appearance of the PERIsign curves of all subjects, including those from the healthy volunteers. The duration of the PERIsign examination will be documented, and usability data will be gathered, including the need for sensor adjustments, subject perception of the examination, and any discomfort experienced. In addition, blinded physicians will evaluate all subjects' PERIsign curves and determine whether each subject has involuntary muscle defense as a sign of peritonitis. These blinded physicians will have access to all 4 PERIsign curves obtained during each examination, while other data will not be disclosed to them. Safety will be evaluated through analysis of reported adverse events and device deficiencies

Detailed description

METHODOLOGY The PERIsign system is intended to aid physicians in demonstrating involuntary muscle defense as a sign of peritonitis by assessing involuntary activity in abdominal muscles by use of sEMG sensors and induced pressure. In this investigation, all subjects will undergo examinations with the PERIsign system. For subjects with suspected appendicitis, assessments will be performed at the clinic on up to 2 occasions. An initial examination will occur when the patient is scheduled for surgery and admitted to the hospital. The following examination is optional and will occur 4-6 hours after the initial examination but before their planned surgery. Post-operative clinical assessments, patho-anatomical diagnosis and clinical end diagnosis will be collected from medical journals, 30 ±5 days after the initial examination. For the healthy volunteers, there is only 1 examination. INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICAL DEVICE The PERIsign system is a medical device designed to measure the contractions of the internus and externus oblique muscles in the abdomen by use of surface electromyography (sEMG) sensors and induced pressure to facilitate the evaluation of a patient with acute abdominal pain. The PERIsign system aims to aid physicians in demonstrating involuntary muscle defense as a sign of peritonitis, an inflammation of the peritoneum, by measuring muscle activity both at rest and in response to pressure on the abdominal wall. The PERIsign Minimal Viable Product is the first iteration of the device and will be used for the present clinical investigation. It comprises four sensor heads with connections, used together with single use sensor electrodes, that are applied to four specific locations on the patient's abdomen, and one reference electrode attached to the hand. Each sensor head has a pressure sensor on top that measures the pressure applied to the sensor, mimicking the manual palpation performed by a physician. The PERIsign system will display and record the patient's muscle activity and the pressure being applied to their abdomen. PERIsign is connected to a laptop for data collection.

Interventions

DEVICEPERIsign examination

Patients will be examined with the new device, PERIsign

Sponsors

Aurevia
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Region Halland
CollaboratorOTHER
STB INN AB
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria for healthy volunteers For enrolment in the investigation, healthy volunteers must fulfil all the following criteria: 1. Subject is 18-70 years of age 2. The subject reports having understood and has signed the Informed Consent Form (ICF) and is willing to comply with all assessments 3. The subject should have a sufficient height and physical build to enable the attachment of the PERIsign sensors to their abdomen, as judged by the Investigator Inclusion criteria for the patient group For enrolment in the investigation, patients must fulfil all the following criteria: 1. Patient is 18-70 years of age 2. The patient reports having understood and has signed the ICF and is willing to comply with all assessments 3. The patient is admitted to the hospital with suspected appendicitis and scheduled for emergency surgery within 24 hours. 4. Patient is deemed clinically stable, as judged by the Investigator 5. The patient should have a sufficient height and physical build to enable the attachment of the PERIsign sensors to their abdomen, as judged by the Investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of subjects experiencing any adverse events during the examination1 hourEvaluation of there is any adverse events during the examination of the new diagnostic device.
Proportion of device deficiencies during the evaluation1 hourEvaluation of there is any device deficiencies during the examination of the new diagnostic device.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing pathological muscle defense when using the PERIsign system1 hourDuring the evaluation the examiner interprets the graphical curves presented by the PERIsign system to evaluate and determine if there is an involuntary muscle defense at the subjects abdominal wall. The sensitivity and specificity will be calculated.
Proportion of examinations of the PERIsign system that its performed without usability issues.1 hourThe usability of the PERIsign system is tested by measuring how long the examination will take and how easy it is to use bye the examiner.

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026