Skip to content

Safer Aging With Diabetes Monitoring

Pragmatic Clinical Trial of Continuous Glucose Monitoring-based Interventions for Safe Insulin Use in High-Risk Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06296485
Acronym
SAGE
Enrollment
360
Registered
2024-03-06
Start date
2024-05-01
Completion date
2028-01-31
Last updated
2026-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hypoglycemia

Keywords

Hypoglycemia, Diabetes Education, Continuous Glucose Monitor

Brief summary

Older adults with type 2 diabetes are at higher risk for severe hypoglycemia and its related complications (including hospitalization and death) when taking insulin. This study proposes to evaluate, in a randomized clinical trial, a strategy of safe insulin prescribing based on an educational program that leverages continuous glucose monitoring to support older adults at high risk for hypoglycemia. If the aims of this project are achieved, this novel care strategy could be widely applied to reduce severe hypoglycemia episodes in older, high-risk adults with type 2 diabetes.

Detailed description

The overarching goal of this pragmatic randomized clinical trial is to support safer diabetes care in older adults (age ≥ 75) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who require insulin therapy. Many of these older adults are at high risk for severe hypoglycemia due to symptom unawareness and/or nocturnal hypoglycemia. Effective and safe management in this population requires close glucose monitoring coupled with proactive medication and diet adjustment to avoid severe iatrogenic consequences. This study proposes to achieve this goal through a patient-oriented intervention program that incorporates the use of alarm-enabled continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). There are currently no major randomized trials directly assessing the use of CGM to reduce severe hypoglycemia among the oldest adults with T2D. The study team will conduct a 2-arm trial: 1) Group-based, three-session education intervention (CGM provided to participants) vs. 2) usual care (no CGM provided to participants). The primary outcome is an aggregate measure of clinically significant hypoglycemia. The study will also examine differences in patient-reported diabetes distress, fear of hypoglycemia, and self-efficacy using validated survey measures.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSAGE Group Sessions

Participants enroll in 3 educational group sessions and receive CGMs

OTHERUsual Care

Participants continue to receive usual care (Control Arm)

Sponsors

Kaiser Permanente
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participant randomization status will be masked during data collection (baseline and follow-up surveys) by research assistants

Intervention model description

2-arm pragmatic randomized clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
75 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 75 years and older * Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes * Current treatment with insulin * Increased hypoglycemia risk (prior year hypoglycemia by self-report or utilization) * Able to communicate in English * Able to access email and the Internet

Exclusion criteria

* On renal dialysis * Dementia * Pacemaker or Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator * Using insulin pump * Severe Mental Illness * Severe Visual Impairment * In Hospice * Current or recent CGM use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hypoglycemia aggregate outcome6 and 12 months after study start dateThis outcome will compare the proportion of patients in the three study arms with self-reported hypoglycemia (symptomatic and/or requiring help from others) and/or hypoglycemia-related utilization (emergency department, hospital or outpatient new events) 6- and 12-months after enrollment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-reported hypoglycemia6 and 12 months after study start dateThis outcome will compare the proportion of patients in the three study arms with self-reported hypoglycemia (symptomatic and/or requiring help from others)
Hypoglycemia-related utilization6 and 12 months after study start dateThis outcome will compare the proportion of patients in the three study arms with hypoglycemia-related utilization (emergency department, hospital or outpatient new events)
Diabetes Distress6 and 12 months after study start dateThis outcome will compare responses to the 2-item, validated Diabetes Distress survey
Hypoglycemia Confidence6 and 12 months after study start dateThis outcome will compare responses to the 9-item, validated Hypoglycemia Confidence survey
Hypoglycemia Distress6 and 12 months after study start dateThis outcome will compare responses to the 3-item, validated Hypoglycemia Distress survey

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTCarolina Gonzalez
Susana.C.Gonzalez@kp.org866-206-2969
CONTACTEmma M Fernandez
emma.m.fernandez@kp.org866-206-2969
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORRichard W Grant, MD MPH

Kaiser Permanente Northern California - Division of Research

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 5, 2026