Diet, Healthy, Health Behavior
Conditions
Keywords
front-of-package labels, ultra-processed food, food and beverage purchases
Brief summary
Purpose: The overall purpose of this study is to identify the impacts of an ultra-processed (UPF) health warning label and UPF identify warning label compared to a control label (i.e., a barcode). Participants: \ 4,000 US Latino adults of parental age (18-55 years), approximately 50% of whom will have limited English proficiency, recruited from a Latino-focused panel company. Procedures: Participants will be randomly assigned to view food products with one of three label types: health warning labels, identity labels, or barcode control labels. Participants will be asked a series of questions about the products and the label they were assigned.
Detailed description
On the study platform (Qualtrics), participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 arms with equal probability: a UPF health warning label, a UPF identity label, or a barcode control label. Participants will view four products (a fruit-flavored drink, pretzels, a yogurt, and a breakfast cereal) displayed in random order, each with a label displayed on the front of package according to the participants' study arm. Participants will complete a 13-item online survey to assess each product as to a) whether the product is ultra-processed; b) perceptions of healthfulness; c) intentions to purchase the product.
Interventions
Message displayed on warning label is: WARNING: Consuming ultra-processed food and drinks can cause weight gain, which increases the risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes.
Message displayed on warning label is: WARNING: Ultra-processed food.
Barcode is displayed.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Identifying as Latino or Hispanic * Ages 18-55 years old * Currently resides in the United States
Exclusion criteria
* Not identifying as Latino or Hispanic * Less than 18 or greater than 55 years old * Not residing in the United States
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Identification of a product as ultra-processed | Immediately after exposure to intervention, assessed during 1-time online study visit. | Correct identification of a product as ultra-processed. Measured with the question, Do you think this product is ultra-processed? Response options are Yes, No, and I'm not sure. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived product healthfulness of ultra-processed products | Immediately after exposure to intervention, assessed during 1-time online study visit. | Measured with the question, How good or bad for your health would it be to consume this product every day? Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from Very bad (coded as 1) to Very good (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher perceived healthfulness. |
| Intentions to purchase ultra-processed products | Immediately after exposure to intervention, assessed during 1-time online study visit. | Measured with the question, How likely would you be to purchase this product in the next week, if it were available? Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from Not at all likely (coded as 1) to Extremely likely (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher intention to purchase ultra-processed products. |
| Perceived message effectiveness | Immediately after exposure to intervention, assessed during 1-time online study visit. | Measured with the question, How much does this message discourage you from wanting to consume an ultra-processed food or drink? Likert responses are on a 1 to 5 scale, from Not at all (coded as 1) to Very much (coded as 5), with higher scores representing a higher perceived message effectiveness. |
Countries
United States