Skip to content

The Accuracy of Reconstruction of Orbital Walls Fracture Using Prebent Mesh Versus Patient Specific Implant

The Accuracy of Reconstruction of Orbital Walls Fracture Using Prebent Mesh Versus Patient Specific Implant : A Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06294535
Enrollment
20
Registered
2024-03-05
Start date
2023-12-11
Completion date
2024-12-06
Last updated
2025-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orbital Fractures

Keywords

orbital wall reconstruction, prebent titanium mesh, patient specific implant, PEEK

Brief summary

under GA, incision to access to orbital walls. Then insertion of prebent titanium mesh or customized titanium implant and fixation with miniscrews, examination of ocular motility using forced duction test followed by closure of flap.

Detailed description

under GA, incision to access to orbital walls. complete reflection of orbital floor to be constructed then insertion of customized orbital implant of patient or insertion of titanium mrsh after adaption on the model and fixation with miniscrews, examination of ocular motility using forced duction test followed by closure of flap.

Interventions

DEVICEreconstruction of orbital walls

under GA, incision to access to orbital walls. Then insertion of prebent titanium mesh or customized titanium implant and fixation with miniscrews, examination of ocular motility using forced duction test followed by closure of flap.

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

patient select randomly from closed label

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patient had fractured orbital walls suffering from enophthalmous, hypoglobus, diplopia

Exclusion criteria

* systemic disease interfere with bone healing enophthamous less than 2 mm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
restoring the accurate position of eyeone month- six monthsusing exophthalmometer to measure enophthalmous
motility of eyeone monthusing 9 gaze test to evaluate motility of eye
volume of orbitone to six monthsusing CT scan to measure orbital volume pre and postoperative

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026