Skip to content

Front-of-package Label Effects in Latine and Limited English Proficiency Populations

Centering Equity in FDA Regulation: Front-of-package Food Label Effects in Latine and Limited English Proficiency Populations

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06293963
Enrollment
3306
Registered
2024-03-05
Start date
2024-08-09
Completion date
2024-09-11
Last updated
2025-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diet, Healthy

Brief summary

The goal of this experiment is to examine the effects of 4 types of front-of-package food labels among a sample of Latino adults. The main questions this experiment aims to answer are: What front-of-package label design is most effective in helping Latino and low English proficiency consumers identify healthier and less healthy food products? What front-of-package label design is most effective in helping Latino and low English proficiency consumers choose healthier food products? Additionally, this experiment also aims to answer the following question: Do the benefits of front-of-package label designs differ by English proficiency and parental status? Participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 4 types of front-of-package label designs and view their assigned label design on 3 sets of products. Each set will display 3 similar products, each high in either 1, 2, or 3 nutrients of concern. For each set, participants will select the product that they believe to be the healthiest, least healthy, and the product that they would most want to consume. Researchers will compare results across label designs.

Detailed description

This study aims to determine which front-of-package label design is most effective at helping Latino consumers identify and choose healthier products, as well as explore whether the benefits of different front-of-package label designs differ by English proficiency. A Latino-focused panel company will recruit 4,000 US Latino adults of parental age (18-55 years), approximately 50% of whom will have limited English proficiency. In a between-subjects experiment, researchers will randomize participants to 1 of 4 types of front-of-package label designs: a numerical label, an interpretive text-only label, an interpretive label with a magnifying glass icon, or separated interpretive labels with a magnifying glass icon. Participants will view their assigned label design on 3 similar products (each product high in either 1, 2, or 3 nutrients of concern) and complete selection tasks. These tasks will be repeated 3 times, each time with a different type of product (i.e., frozen meals, frozen pizzas, and frozen desserts), with the products displayed in random order.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALGuideline Daily Amounts label

Labels that list the amount and percent of daily value of added sugar, sodium, or saturated fat, modeled after Guideline Daily Amounts labels.

Interpretive text-only labels that state when a product contains high amounts of added sugar, sodium, or saturated fat.

Interpretive labels that state when a product contains high amounts of added sugar, sodium, or saturated fat, containing a magnifying glass icon.

Interpretive labels that state when a product contains high amounts of added sugar, sodium, or saturated fat, containing a magnifying glass icon. Each nutrient will be on a separate label.

Sponsors

Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
Stanford University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Identifying as Latino or Hispanic * Ages 18-55 years old * Residing in US

Exclusion criteria

* Not identifying as Latino or Hispanic * Less than 18 or greater than 55 years old * Not residing in the United States

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correct identification of healthiest productDuring exposure to intervention (i.e., study stimuli), assessed during one-time online 10-minute survey.Correct identification of healthiest product will be measured by survey. Responses will be coded in a dichotomous 0-1 range, where 1 indicates that the participant correctly identified the healthiest product and 0 indicates that the participant incorrectly identified one of the other two less healthy products as the healthiest product.
Correct identification of least healthy productDuring exposure to intervention (i.e., study stimuli), assessed during one-time online 10-minute survey.Correct identification of least healthy product will be measured by survey. Responses will be coded in a dichotomous 0-1 range, where 1 indicates that the participant correctly identified the least healthy product and 0 indicates that the participant incorrectly identified one of the other two healthier products as the least healthy product.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correct identification of products high in nutrientsDuring exposure to intervention (i.e., study stimuli), assessed during one-time online 10-minute survey.Correct identification of products high in nutrients (i.e., sugar, saturated fat, or sodium) will be measured by survey. Responses will be coded in a dichotomous 0-1 range, where 1 indicates that the participant correctly identified products that are high in a given nutrient and 0 indicates that the participant incorrectly identified products that are not high in a given nutrient as being high in such nutrient.
Selection of healthiest product for purchaseDuring exposure to intervention (i.e., study stimuli), assessed during one-time online 10-minute survey.Selection of healthiest product for purchase will be measured by survey. Responses will be coded in a dichotomous 0-1 range, where 1 indicates that the participant chose the healthiest product and 0 indicates that the participants selected one of the other two less healthy products.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026